MavsBoard

Full Version: DAL OFFSEASON: Trade & FA | Mavs "mostly done...but you never know."
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412
I myself have come away from the big bodied C request, but keep the principal requirement that the big body fills. The need to bang with the bangers in the league. We need a guy Like RoCo, Tucker or Green that plays bigger than they are. The guys that can alleviate KP from needing to deal with those powerful guys that are still in the league and have career nights when they go up against us.

I don’t see that in anyone on the roster that will play significant minutes when it is necessary and become that career night bruiser when it’s not.
(09-10-2020, 02:11 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Wright...is certainly a better defender than most of the Mavs' players but he just isn't a fit. Rick could never really find a role for him so he is like 99% gone this offseason imo. 

I could see him flourishing on another team, especially one that could let him hold the ball more on offense. On the Mavs team he had to do more off-ball stuff which didn't really suit his game. 

This is my point, exactly. And, I'll add this: if Wright has to have the ball in his hands in order to contribute on offense, which seems to be the case, then which playoff team is signing up for that? In other words, since he's clearly a below average choice to initiate your offense, isn't that just another way of saying he can't play on a good team?

Identifying these issues BEFORE a player is acquired is paramount to effective team building. And, while the Wright error doesn't ruin anything, it does present an issue you have to overcome to move forward. This acquisition, rather than any player the team DIDN'T acquire, was the biggest failure of the last off season. This is my point. No more moves like that, just so people can see that you're "doing something." And, to be fair, the better the team gets, the more defined their holes become, so it should get easier for the front office to tell the difference between good moves and bad moves as time passes.
@"Dundalis" - how exactly are you going to get Bradley Beal? He would be the hottest name in the trade market if he became available. You would need a Paul George-type trade which the Mavs simply don't have the assets to pull off.
(09-10-2020, 02:30 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]I myself have come away from the big bodied C request, but keep the principal requirement that the big body fills. The need to bang with the bangers in the league. We need a guy Like RoCo, Tucker or Green that plays bigger than they are. The guys that can alleviate KP from needing to deal with those powerful guys that are still in the league and have career nights when they go up against us.

I don’t see that in anyone on the roster that will play significant minutes when it is necessary and become that career night bruiser when it’s not.

RoCo/Tucker types to play WITH KP and DFS, yes!!!! They're quick enough, physical enough, and they understand what they need to contribute on offense to win. They have to be guarded, and if you double off of them, you pay for it. 

RoCo/Tucker types to play instead of DFS at a position they would have played 10 years ago, because a team is stuck in the mud thinking that KP should be used exactly like Dirk was (who would 110% be a center today, even as a 25 year old), just so some guy could be on the court for the sole reason that "he's big, so that must mean our defense is better when he plays" NO! 

Same page?
(09-10-2020, 02:33 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]@"Dundalis" - how exactly are you going to get Bradley Beal? He would be the hottest name in the trade market if he became available. You would need a Paul George-type trade which the Mavs simply don't have the assets to pull off.
I think that was in reference to someone he would trade KP for. In that case I think we have the assets if we want to.
(09-10-2020, 02:39 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2020, 02:33 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]@"Dundalis" - how exactly are you going to get Bradley Beal? He would be the hottest name in the trade market if he became available. You would need a Paul George-type trade which the Mavs simply don't have the assets to pull off.
I think that was in reference to someone he would trade KP for. In that case I think we have the assets if we want to.

Gotcha ya that's what it would take. I know some are nervous ab KP but it's too early to be talking trade with him. At least for the foreseeable future he is a Mav.

(09-10-2020, 02:38 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]RoCo/Tucker types to play WITH KP and DFS, yes!!!! They're quick enough, physical enough, and they understand what they need to contribute on offense to win. They have to be guarded, and if you double off of them, you pay for it. 

Man it would be great, but those guys don't grow on trees. I was really big on the Mavs trying to get RoCo at the trade deadline.

Who is actually available that the Mavs could get?
(09-10-2020, 02:38 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2020, 02:30 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]I myself have come away from the big bodied C request, but keep the principal requirement that the big body fills. The need to bang with the bangers in the league. We need a guy Like RoCo, Tucker or Green that plays bigger than they are. The guys that can alleviate KP from needing to deal with those powerful guys that are still in the league and have career nights when they go up against us.

I don’t see that in anyone on the roster that will play significant minutes when it is necessary and become that career night bruiser when it’s not.

RoCo/Tucker types to play WITH KP and DFS, yes!!!! They're quick enough, physical enough, and they understand what they need to contribute on offense to win. They have to be guarded, and if you double off of them, you pay for it. 

RoCo/Tucker types to play instead of DFS at a position they would have played 10 years ago, because a team is stuck in the mud thinking that KP should be used exactly like Dirk was (who would 110% be a center today, even as a 25 year old), just so some guy could be on the court for the sole reason that "he's big, so that must mean our defense is better when he plays" NO! 

Same page?

Absolutely.


I think Adams would be a really expensive Boban replacement nowadays. One that could get and stay on the court more than Boban, but still roughly the same role.

One of the reasons I want to keep Young in the Chi trades I’m proposing cause I think he is that type of guy where I think OPJ is more the finesse defender. That duo would be killer on the league with the rest of our team (minus what it takes to get them)!
(09-10-2020, 02:43 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Who is actually available that the Mavs could get?

I have no idea, my dude, and I suspect that none of us do. My jihad today has been an effort to illustrate that no, you're right: they DON'T grow on trees, so while we're searching for them, we'd better resign ourselves to the idea that what we have is pretty damn good, and that part of the goal should be to maintain or improve a position to pounce if/when one or three of them become available. 

I'll stop beating the horse for a while, now.
(09-10-2020, 02:43 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Who is actually available that the Mavs could get?
Other than Young who Dan has turned me on to, I wonder about Gordon who I think will be available, but not sure if at a price we have to pay. Haven’t watched him enough to know if he plays bigger than he is or is just so much more athletic than who he is defending but if so, he would be the top of the list to me.


I’ll have to get back to you on any more than that.
(09-10-2020, 02:11 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Wright is a good defender, but much moreso off-ball. His on-ball defense actually wasn't that great.


Wright was just an average defender over the course of the whole season, IMO. He was AMAZING off-ball in different spurts, but then would be invisible as a defender for long stretches. The numbers bear this out (he was -0.97 DRPM for instance).

The problem with Delon was he killed the offense AND didn't help the D in any noticeable way most of the time.

Tomas and OPJ are likely BOTH huge improvements on both sides of the ball from Delon.

(09-10-2020, 02:04 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]I would think it would be something like Tomas/OPJ for JJ/Wright/THJ and probably both picks would have to be sent.


Yes that trade works. 

[Image: Screenshot-2020-09-10-at-3.06.35-PM.png]
(09-10-2020, 02:56 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2020, 02:43 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: [ -> ]Who is actually available that the Mavs could get?
Other than Young who Dan has turned me on to, I wonder about Gordon who I think will be available, but not sure if at a price we have to pay. Haven’t watched him enough to know if he plays bigger than he is or is just so much more athletic than who he is defending but if so, he would be the top of the list to me.


I’ll have to get back to you on any more than that.

I like Gordon, but to be honest, I don't think he represents significant improvement with KP. I think you run into the same problems you do with Powell, and I'm not sure that Powell isn't the smarter, more effective player. They're very similar players in that both would be the roll man, which basically makes KP the dude who stands in the corner. Right now, today, my thinking is that the better choice between those two for the Mavs' needs is the one more likely to accept a role coming off of the bench. I could be talked out of that, however.

(09-10-2020, 03:05 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]The problem with Delon was he killed the offense AND didn't help the D in any noticeable way most of the time.

Have you considered the idea that maybe the two sides of that coin are linked? Like, is it not possible that trying to play a role on offense for which he was ill-suited affected his focus on the other end? Because I honestly think the dude was in his own head all season, passing up open shots, etc.

I mean, I'm not arguing with your plus/minus evaluations (or whatever) and ultimately, I agree with your assessment of the player, but I do feel like the guy is interchangeable with the type of "defenders" a lot of fans are convinced the team needs. The reality is that on court fit affects results, and not always in easily noticeable ways.
(09-10-2020, 03:08 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]Have you considered the idea that maybe the two sides of that coin are linked? Like, is it not possible that trying to play a role on offense for which he was ill-suited affected his focus on the other end? Because I honestly think the dude was in his own head all season, passing up open shots, etc.


I was VERY careful in my language not to say "Delon is a bad defender"....I am simply saying he was a bad defender statistically (and to my eye test) this past year overall. 

And yes, I absolutely think his lack of comfortability overall in RC's system affected his game all year. I am hopeful that he still has value (and should) league wide and the Mavs can get something solid in return for him. 

Obviously my favorite hope is to have him central to a trade for OPJ/Tomas.
Yeah, Kamm, I'm not trying to put words in your mouth at all. I'm just saying that the difference between "not bad" and "great" on defense might just come down to attitude and effort. Tough to be in the mindset required to flourish when you're not confident you can do what's being asked of you. 

I hope he still has value, too, and I could even be talked into "hey, after seeing him in our system for a year, we've got him working on X, Y and Z, and we're confident he'll fit better next year." But, yeah, I'm sure they're trying to move him. Just saying.

Ironically enough, I'm listening to a podcast right now where JJ Redick and Kevin Durant are saying Jrue Holiday is "the best defender in the NBA." Man, I wish he was available.
(09-10-2020, 03:27 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2020, 03:08 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]Have you considered the idea that maybe the two sides of that coin are linked? Like, is it not possible that trying to play a role on offense for which he was ill-suited affected his focus on the other end? Because I honestly think the dude was in his own head all season, passing up open shots, etc.


I was VERY careful in my language not to say "Delon is a bad defender"....I am simply saying he was a bad defender statistically (and to my eye test) this past year overall. 

And yes, I absolutely think his lack of comfortability overall in RC's system affected his game all year. I am hopeful that he still has value (and should) league wide and the Mavs can get something solid in return for him. 

Obviously my favorite hope is to have him central to a trade for OPJ/Tomas.

Also playing bad on offense always puts pressure on the defense because of the transition opportunities.
(09-10-2020, 03:31 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]I'm just saying that the difference between "not bad" and "great" on defense might just come down to attitude and effort.


No question. The "line" in the NBA is RAZOR thin. Tiny things can make a big difference when everyone out there is talented and athletic as hell.

(09-10-2020, 03:31 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]Jrue Holiday is "the best defender in the NBA." Man, I wish he was available.


He would be great. My concern with him is that he has crossed the 30 year old point and is close to 24,000 minutes in the NBA....at some point his body is not going to let him be what he once was on D or O.
(09-10-2020, 03:34 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-10-2020, 03:31 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]Jrue Holiday is "the best defender in the NBA." Man, I wish he was available.


He would be great. My concern with him is that he has crossed the 30 year old point and is close to 24,000 minutes in the NBA....at some point his body is not going to let him be what he once was on D or O.

Ok, so to me, THIS is where the fascinating conversation happens, because going into this season I would have agreed wholeheartedly. And, I'm not saying you're wrong now, but the fact that the team is this good this soon has me wondering if the Mavs FO might not be looking for dudes at exactly that point in their careers. Winners. I can't honestly say what I think about the timeline, because I don't know. It will be interesting to learn what THEY think though, and we should find out pretty soon. How they handle the draft will tell us a lot.

What I am prepared to say is that if I'm running the Pelicans, I definitely don't see him as a fit with their timeline. I mean, Zion, Ingram and Ball are nice, don't get me wrong, but those dudes don't have a clue how to win yet, and someone like Holiday is wasted there, at the moment. Given his age and value, I move that dude for any asset I can get and never look back. It will be interesting to see what THEY think, too.
I would definitely be on board with Jrue who is a longtime Mavs target and who would be a great fit imo as the 3rd guy. Pels have been collecting a bunch of assets so picks + expiring might get a deal? Pels could then flip those plus other stuff for moves they want to make.

I would be hesitant to give up any of our player assets like Curry. Jrue would be an upgrade over Curry so I would give it some consideration tho if it came to that.
(09-10-2020, 02:21 PM)Dundalis Wrote: [ -> ]I love KP's upside. But you can't really call KP's injury concerns overblown IMO. He does not play anywhere near as physical as some of the guys his injury records is compared to. Joel Embiid and Anthony Davis are players who score way more through contact in the paint than KP, who actively avoids contact.


I only call it overblown given the severity of his injuries. He's had only 1 injury everyone would agree would be major. And it occurred during a contact play where KP drove and dunked all over Giannis' face. His other knee injury occurred again when Morris (Or Zubac, forgot) landed on his knee falling to the ground. Both contact plays.

Other than that, KP has only missed time due to general soreness of areas. But overall he's been more available than most. Over the course of his career he's been available 77% of the time. Not great. But that number isn't low enough to even consider trading KP because of the production he brings. Conversely, Joel Embiid's available 65% of the time. AD is 80%. Etc. 
(09-10-2020, 02:21 PM)Dundalis Wrote: [ -> ]There are a bunch of instances where I'd trade KP. The first one would actually be for Giannis. That's in the unlikely scenario that Giannis basically refuses to sign the supermax and declares he wants to leave. If he does want to leave, I could actually see a scenario where he feels like he doesn't want to leave the Bucks empty handed and gives them the opportunity to actually get something in return. Trading KP for Giannis might seem silly since you could get him for nothing in FA, but if you could trade for him with the guarantee he'd sign the extension, you've removed KP's contract and the real injury risk from the books, while still giving yourself the opportunity to potentially free up enough space get another FA at the end of the season like a Jrue Holiday. With a Luka/Giannis combo, eveyone else is making up the numbers really, that duo is basically dominating on their own for 10 years.


Trading KP for Giannis is one of the few trades I would make, because of how hilariously lopsided it'd be. Trading a 1x all-star big man for a 2xMVP and DPOY in his prime is lopsided. Of course if Giannis signs the extension and is here for 5 years, then I'd make that trade faster than the speed of light. Luka X Giannis is an even more unstoppable duo than Luka X KP. The only question, and one that you touched upon, is that if Giannis is ready to leave MIL, he probably has a good idea of where he wants to go. If he was willing to sign an extension to be in Dallas, that means that he would theoretically choose Dallas in free agency. Thus making the move to trade KP FOR Giannis kinda dumb, because you could have all 3. 


(09-10-2020, 02:21 PM)Dundalis Wrote: [ -> ]The other trade scenario would be for Bradley Beal. Similar situation. Bring in another elite scorer and ball handler, who's game is likely elevated by Luka, and you still have the ability to move another piece or two to free up space to go after someone like Gobert in FA if you want a defensive anchor to replace KP. With scorers of the caliber of Luka and Beal, playing 5 out is less important IMO, Gobert is out constantly setting picks for both of them.


Now here is where we differ. I would not trade KP for Beal. Beal is an electric 2. And can score in bunches. A dude that would fit perfectly here alongside KP (and Luka). Not instead of in my opinion.  Trading KP, a dude who put up 23/10 on 44/37/80 in the last 34 games of his season for a guy that put up some incredible scoring (30ppg) in the same amount of games as KP would at best be a wash.  Is the Luka/Beal drastically better than Luka/KP? Maybe on the offensive end, but defensively they'd be much worse. And to try to replicate the defense by signing Gobert to a max contract would be drastically worse since effectively we split up KP into 2 max players that do the same things he does. 

If I was the Mavs I'd be doing everything I could to nab Beal from Washington to pair with Luka and KP. He'd be a perfect fit to round out the team. But to give up KP for Beal would at best be a lateral move. 
(09-10-2020, 02:21 PM)Dundalis Wrote: [ -> ]There is easily enough of an injury risk with KP to where he is clearly tradeable for certain high level players, I'm sure there's others you'd trade him for, but the above two are elite level players who actually may become available. He's also 25 and coming into his prime, but has never really put together a great season that really validates his talent level, hence we constantly talk about what he can do, or his potential. I get there's reasons for that, but it becomes less of an interesting argument the more you have to keep referencing potential for a player as they start to move into their mid-late 20's.

And I believe we are in agreement though. There IS an injury risk with KP. I believe the risk is a bit overblown given that he's only had 1 major injury in his career. The major injury occurred in a contact play. And all other injuries were general soreness. And to avoid injuries is impossible. It's apart of the game and short of Lebron James (who showed he was human last season) every single player gets them. Regardless of the risk, I believe he's worth it given the spectacular production he has shown this season alone. Which is exactly the same thought process that's applied with guys just as much if not more of an injury risk around the league like Kawhi Leonard or Joel Embiid. 

With that said, there are a few guys I'd trade KP for. Giannis being one. Kawhi being another. However the list of players that would net a return that is an clear cut improvement over KP is small. So small that it's unrealistic and counter-productive given that we're trying to take the next step in contending.
Only way to get to Jrue from the Mavs would have to be a package with THJ IMO, for the simple fact that salaries have to match. THJ and Brunson works actually for salary purposes and then we can figure out additional assets like picks and such. Brunson and THJ on their team wouldn't be bad, but I think they would probably be able to get a package elsewhere and from a team that they don't have to compete with before Jrue hangs them up.
(09-10-2020, 05:17 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: [ -> ]Only way to get to Jrue from the Mavs would have to be a package with THJ IMO, for the simple fact that salaries have to match. THJ and Brunson works actually for salary purposes and then we can figure out additional assets like picks and such. Brunson and THJ on their team wouldn't be bad, but I think they would probably be able to get a package elsewhere and from a team that they don't have to compete with before Jrue hangs them up.

I was just looking at Hardaway, an Opt-in WCS and Brunson.  Plus the picks 18, 31 and our 2025 1st.  I would like to get back Jrue and their two 2nd rnd picks, 39 and 42.

Is this still to lite?
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412