MavsBoard

Full Version: DAL OFFSEASON: Trade & FA | Mavs "mostly done...but you never know."
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412
"Westbrook has informed team officials that he has been uneasy about the team's accountability and culture, and has a desire to return to his prior, floor-general role in Oklahoma City," according to The Athletic.
(11-11-2020, 07:43 PM)DanSchwartzman Wrote: [ -> ]I don't believe I ever put Beverley and Oubre together in a deal to Dallas.  The outgoing needed is either too painful or unrealistic.


That was me. Wink 

https://qabickcents.com/dallasbasketball...hp?tid=565&pid=42006#pid42006
(11-11-2020, 07:49 PM)cow Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2020, 07:42 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2020, 07:26 PM)cow Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2020, 07:02 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]One reason the Mavs may like Oubre (Fish has reported Mavs liked him in Washington) is that he's shown the last few years that he's a pretty decent wing in the PNR being around the 70th percentile. That's not elite by any means. But for a 24 year old wing that was pretty raw coming out? I think that's pretty good with plenty of room to improve. He definitely has good handles for a wing. 

He's an improving shooter with solid form. I'd think the Mavs probably see that continuing to improve and that they can work on that a bit. 

He's got the physical tools to be a really good defender. He is not yet by any means. And maybe he won't be but he's also been on bad teams that don't play defense. I think he's got the potential to actually be a plus defender if he wants to be. Again he may not want to be that type of guy. 

And lastly he's very athletic and a slashing type. I'd have to think the Mavs want more of that moving forward to not rely on shooting jumpers so much. IMO the biggest thing holding Oubre back offensively is that he's not yet figured out how to really excel off ball unless he's spotting up for a shot. He's way too athletic to not be a huge threat to cutting to the basket. If you check the advanced stats in those areas, his game is completely non existent. 

In a normal offseason I'd be chomping at the bit to get Oubre but it's hard to imagine a huge improvement with a shortened offseason. You don't have 3-4 months to work with him but 3-4 weeks.

For 31, sure.  18 and DFS are a no-go, not for a 1-year rental.  I expected a bigger leap from him and that's never materialized. maybe he's never been in the right situation.  If he's bound and determined to be a free agent and we still like him, chase him next year.

Well the reason you should make the move now is that you can go over the cap to sign him next summer. If you do indeed get rid of Powell and Wright this offseason, I believe you are going to be able to squeeze in keeping one of Curry and Kleber and having max cap space while retaining the bird rights to Oubre. It's just rough math in my head so don't quote me on that ha. 
Basically you get a max free agent commit, ship off Kleber or Curry and then sign Oubre to whatever # is necessary to keep him.  Of course if you don't think he is getting over 15 mill than it doesn't really matter. 

Of course all of that is off the table if you got to take Bev.

That's a good point but you'd have to have more confidence in Oubre working out than I do.   As of today, I prefer DFS who has shown continued improvement and is on a controlled/affordable contract.  I think I also prefer the 18th pick lottery ticket over the Oubre blossoming lottery ticket because again, you'll control that player for 4 years.  Now let me stick my fingers in my ears as everyone reminds me of the MBT drafting prowess

I can see us getting off of Wright but I don't think we can get off of Powell.

I'm not necessarily advocating for it. But if I'm getting rid of Powell and Wright and getting Oubre, I'm sending out 18 in a heartbeat. 

I don't think I'm for a deal where I'm taking back longer term money like Beverly. I'm not plan powder for 2021 but I also don't want to exhaust any bit of cap space for guys like Beverly, Powell or Wright. We have our role players with their salaries here already. We need long term starters. Either trade for or wait to sign them in FA next year.
(11-11-2020, 07:56 PM)Tyler Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2020, 07:43 PM)DanSchwartzman Wrote: [ -> ]I don't believe I ever put Beverley and Oubre together in a deal to Dallas.  The outgoing needed is either too painful or unrealistic.


That was me. Wink 
 

Well, now I feel bad.  I should have stopped after the first sentence.
What is HIBW?
(11-11-2020, 07:56 PM)ClutchDirk Wrote: [ -> ]"Westbrook has informed team officials that he has been uneasy about the team's accountability and culture, and has a desire to return to his prior, floor-general role in Oklahoma City," according to The Athletic.
[Image: giphy.gif]
(11-11-2020, 07:59 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]What is HIBW?

Have It Both Ways.  Not Plan Powder (sorry Killer) and not Plan The Hell With Powder.  Kind of in between.

Got to sign back into work for a while.  Spent way too much time fantasy trading today.  Back in a few hours.
(11-11-2020, 07:59 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]What is HIBW?

'Have it both ways." Improve the team now, have room in '21.
(11-11-2020, 07:59 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]What is HIBW?

it’s the common sense approach to having cap space next summer that we have to pretend is a completely different plan, for some reason.
(11-11-2020, 07:56 PM)ClutchDirk Wrote: [ -> ]"Westbrook has informed team officials that he has been uneasy about the team's accountability and culture, and has a desire to return to his prior, floor-general role in Oklahoma City," according to


So basically what he is saying is, I want to paddle my stats on a losing team Smile
(11-11-2020, 08:02 PM)omahen Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2020, 07:56 PM)ClutchDirk Wrote: [ -> ]"Westbrook has informed team officials that he has been uneasy about the team's accountability and culture, and has a desire to return to his prior, floor-general role in Oklahoma City," according to


So basically what he is saying is, I want to paddle my stats on a losing team Smile

He deserves to have his stat paddled.
(11-11-2020, 08:02 PM)omahen Wrote: [ -> ]
(11-11-2020, 07:56 PM)ClutchDirk Wrote: [ -> ]"Westbrook has informed team officials that he has been uneasy about the team's accountability and culture, and has a desire to return to his prior, floor-general role in Oklahoma City," according to


So basically what he is saying is, I want to paddle my stats on a losing team Smile
No he probably thinks I go back to OKC win 50 games, lose in the 1st round and everything thinks I´m awsome again. Worked for CP3.

So much in this league is about perception.
Isn't it funny that basically every casual NBA observer knew Harden and Westbrook will not work, yet the need to get rid of Paul was so high they actually paid a bunch of picks to OKC.
(11-11-2020, 08:07 PM)omahen Wrote: [ -> ]Isn't it funny that basically every casual NBA observer knew Harden and Westbrook will not work, yet the need to get rid of Paul was so high they actually paid a bunch of picks to OKC.

Yes, very funny. Hilarious, actually.
(11-11-2020, 07:58 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not necessarily advocating for it. But if I'm getting rid of Powell and Wright and getting Oubre, I'm sending out 18 in a heartbeat. 

I don't think I'm for a deal where I'm taking back longer term money like Beverly. I'm not plan powder for 2021 but I also don't want to exhaust any bit of cap space for guys like Beverly, Powell or Wright. We have our role players with their salaries here already. We need long term starters. Either trade for or wait to sign them in FA next year.

I'd think the cost of unloading Powell alone would be greater than 18. Add Wright to the mix and getting a return (Oubre) seems even unlikelier. I know DFS was thrown into the mix but at that point, you are just spending assets to clear up cap space that I'm not positive we'd use appropriately to improve the team.
The only teams I could really make a case for a Westbrook trade making sense would the Knicks because they are desperate for star talent. 

And the Magic. They can't seem to find a PG answer. Gordon and Fournier work with the $. I think that actually makes Houston better. 
Magic might not have interest tho. 

I guess theoretically the Lakers could throw all their contracts that aren't AD and Lebron together to maybe have enough. Not sure why Houston wastes their time with a move like that tho.
I dont think we're getting rid of Powell.  Front office loves the dude and no one else would want him.

They're shopping Delon hard.
Is there a scenario where we can get PatBev for just Wright/Jackson?

If the deal is for PatBev and Oubre to get routed to Dallas I am not sure how the money would work without Powell outgoing and I don't see that happening.

To me the Mavs interest in this multi-team trade would be to get PatBev or Oubre on the cheap (ie Wright/Jackson). PatBev probably wouldn't require a pick but Oubre would cost something. 18 seems way too high but 31 would be fair.
(11-11-2020, 08:09 PM)cjeter24 Wrote: [ -> ]The only teams I could really make a case for a Westbrook trade making sense would the Knicks because they are desperate for star talent. 

And the Magic. They can't seem to find a PG answer. Gordon and Fournier work with the $. I think that actually makes Houston better. 
Magic might not have interest tho. 

I guess theoretically the Lakers could throw all their contracts that aren't AD and Lebron together to maybe have enough. Not sure why Houston wastes their time with a move like that tho.

Yes, ORL and Westbrook were made for each other.
What if we could get PatBev for just Wright and Jackson? That would basically be a do-over from last summer. PatBev would fit in great here.

(11-11-2020, 08:11 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: [ -> ]Yes, ORL and Westbrook were made for each other.

They really are.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412