Lets not forget about his teammate...6 days after injury and one recent pic...
I’m not trusting those KP offseason workout pics. Plus I’m more concerned with how his legs are doing than the biceps
He was already great in year 1! Sky is the limit with him. Main thing he will need to improve is just getting that 3pt% up a little bit and it wasn't even all that terrible for a rookie, I believe he will do it. The form looks great
(09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864
That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.
Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...
Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
(09-23-2019, 05:23 PM)robillionaire Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864
That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.
Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...
Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
I honestly haven't really looked at the specific categories that were posted, but true - seems like the usual suspects are listed.
But anyway, stats are what you want them to be. This Tweet tries to show Luka is clearly better cause he won all these categories. But would anybody truly say Rookie Luka was truly CLEARLY better than Rookie LeBron?
(09-23-2019, 05:29 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 05:23 PM)robillionaire Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ] (09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864
That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.
Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...
Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
I honestly haven't really looked at the specific categories that were posted, but true - seems like the usual suspects are listed.
But anyway, stats are what you want them to be. This Tweet tries to show Luka is clearly better cause he won all these categories. But would anybody truly say Rookie Luka was truly CLEARLY better than Rookie LeBron?
Short answer, yes. Rookie Luka's season was objectively better than rookie LeBron's and it doesn't take rocket science to see that when you compare them side by side. There's a reason the Slovenian Stallion is getting so much hype.
A detractor would say Luka had the advantage of previous pro experience but there's little doubt rookie Luka was better than rookie Bron. Bron made a pretty big second year jump, look out if Luka does the same
Lamelo ball's situation reminds me of all the "future dirks"t had been picked after Dirk. Except that it is luka this time around.
Lamelo ball probably will still be a good player. But expecting him to be doncic is ridiculous considering he's doing less well in a weaker league with more significant holes in his game.