MavsBoard

Full Version: HALLELUKA: Luka Clinches All-NBA 1st team. 4th in 5 years
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Lets not forget about his teammate...6 days after injury and one recent pic...

[Image: 0ei65Ax.jpg][Image: Vvnwyk-I-d.jpg]
I’m not trusting those KP offseason workout pics. Plus I’m more concerned with how his legs are doing than the biceps
He was already great in year 1! Sky is the limit with him. Main thing he will need to improve is just getting that 3pt% up a little bit and it wasn't even all that terrible for a rookie, I believe he will do it. The form looks great
Test failed...
[url=
Quote:SI's All-Decade team: Predicting the NBA's top stars in the 2020s https://t.co/1DeEl2DlL4 pic.twitter.com/DtcjZDazOo
— Sports Illustrated (@SInow) September 20, 2019
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
 
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...

(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864

That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.

Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...
(09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
 
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...

(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864

That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.

Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...


Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
(09-23-2019, 05:23 PM)robillionaire Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
 
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...

(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864

That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.

Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...


Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
 
I honestly haven't really looked at the specific categories that were posted, but true - seems like the usual suspects are listed.

But anyway, stats are what you want them to be. This Tweet tries to show Luka is clearly better cause he won all these categories. But would anybody truly say Rookie Luka was truly CLEARLY better than Rookie LeBron?
[url= [url=pic.twitter.com/D5vDAltxeX
— Sportinfo.si (@Sportinfosi) September 23, 2019 ">
Quote:Doncic was getting to the rim at will since the beginning of february when Mavs made the trade for Porzingis. He was 5th in drives during that time among all players (18.3). Westbrook was 1st with 20.2 drives and Harden 2nd (19.4). And that was Luka when he wasn't in great shape. pic.twitter.com/D5vDAltxeX
— Sportinfo.si (@Sportinfosi) September 23, 2019
(09-23-2019, 05:29 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-23-2019, 05:23 PM)robillionaire Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote: [ -> ]
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
 
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...

(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: [ -> ]
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864

That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.

Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...


Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
 
I honestly haven't really looked at the specific categories that were posted, but true - seems like the usual suspects are listed.

But anyway, stats are what you want them to be. This Tweet tries to show Luka is clearly better cause he won all these categories. But would anybody truly say Rookie Luka was truly CLEARLY better than Rookie LeBron?

Short answer, yes. Rookie Luka's season was objectively better than rookie LeBron's and it doesn't take rocket science to see that when you compare them side by side. There's a reason the Slovenian Stallion is getting so much hype. 

A detractor would say Luka had the advantage of previous pro experience but there's little doubt rookie Luka was better than rookie Bron. Bron made a pretty big second year jump, look out if Luka does the same
Lamelo ball's situation reminds me of all the "future dirks"t had been picked after Dirk. Except that it is luka this time around. 
Lamelo ball probably will still be a good player. But expecting him to be doncic is ridiculous considering he's doing less well in a weaker league with more significant holes in his game.
16. Luka Doncic
AP Photo/David Zalubowski
  • [b]Dallas Mavericks | SF[/b]

  • [b]Previous rank:[/b] 63

  • [b]Projected RPM wins:[/b] 7.8
[b]One big question: [/b]What kind of shape will Doncic be in at the start of the season? He played himself into Rookie of the Year condition after coming in with the excess weight that comes with being the king of Madrid. How Doncic maintains his body is a big factor in whether he's an eventual MVP candidate. -- Schmitz


[Image: giphy.gif]

ESPN ranking of the best players...