(09-23-2019, 05:23 PM)robillionaire Wrote:(09-23-2019, 04:32 PM)WillE Wrote:(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote: https://twitter.com/MZavagno11/status/11...3237387266
Those were probably also less closely defended. You could almost call posting such stats clickbait...
(09-23-2019, 04:02 PM)Kammrath Wrote:
https://twitter.com/NBA_networks/status/...9945252864
That looks nice, but what this tweet doesn't show is those other stat lines where LeBron was better.
Yet anyway we all know the answer: Luka will become three times the player LeBron was. Or even four, five, ...
Which relevant stat lines where Lebron was better do you think could have been included
I honestly haven't really looked at the specific categories that were posted, but true - seems like the usual suspects are listed.
But anyway, stats are what you want them to be. This Tweet tries to show Luka is clearly better cause he won all these categories. But would anybody truly say Rookie Luka was truly CLEARLY better than Rookie LeBron?