Posts: 6,229
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 2,998 in 1,744 posts
Likes Given: 166
Likes Received: 2,998 in 1,744 posts
Likes Given: 166
Joined: Oct 2020
So do we have 4 seconds now?
There is risk in both trades imo. A lot will determine how both fit in. I think both fit the prototype of players we should look for, but that is on paper. Lets see if they can make productive plays on good teams.
I am really anxious to see what our PF lineup looks like and what our finishing lineup looks like. We may be going super big with Washington and Maxi at PF. Jones jr may be boxed out of minutes. For closing games, does Maxi bypass the other two centers and close some games? It will be interesting.
Posts: 1,038
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 270 in 184 posts
Likes Given: 944
Likes Received: 270 in 184 posts
Likes Given: 944
Joined: Oct 2022
Posts: 9,409
Threads: 25
Likes Received: 2,599 in 1,480 posts
Likes Given: 1,805
Likes Received: 2,599 in 1,480 posts
Likes Given: 1,805
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-08-2024, 03:29 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: So do we have 4 seconds now?
Since 2027 is protected, I guess it turns into 2028 SRP if it doesn't convert. So Mavs can't trade that SRP pick. They can trade remaining 3 SRP and if 2024 pick converts to NY, they will also be able to trade 2025 SRP which is locked at the moment by the 2024 pick protections.
Posts: 6,229
Threads: 17
Likes Received: 2,998 in 1,744 posts
Likes Given: 166
Likes Received: 2,998 in 1,744 posts
Likes Given: 166
Joined: Oct 2020
We will see how he does on the court. Defense and rebound will be the big areas to determine if this trade was worth it. A lot of these offensive highlights are transferable to our offense.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCFevN9i-r0
Posts: 234
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 206 in 106 posts
Likes Given: 1,032
Likes Received: 206 in 106 posts
Likes Given: 1,032
Joined: Mar 2021
(02-08-2024, 01:54 PM)Winter Wrote: Coach Powell?
Front office Powell.
Posts: 2,602
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 2,516 in 1,115 posts
Likes Given: 2,079
Likes Received: 2,516 in 1,115 posts
Likes Given: 2,079
Joined: Nov 2020
(02-08-2024, 01:55 PM)F Gump Wrote: I suspect it will be a 3-way OKC-CHA-DAL. OKC pays 2 2nds to CHA as part of the Hayward buy, and those then land in Dallas in the trade (to lessen the net outlay of the 2027 1st from DAL to CHA).
Bad guess! ^ There was no 3-way deal, instead it was separate.
By the time we get to 2028 I may feel differently, but at the moment I'm pleasantly surprised by the trade with OKC.
The Mavs only gave up a pick swap (which, in optimistic scenarios, isn't even exercised). In return, they will end up with not only a 2028 FRP but also a 2024 FRP. And that 2024 FRP had enough value to turn Holmes into Gafford, so it was definitely valuable. Valuable enough!
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 654 in 354 posts
Likes Given: 4
Likes Received: 654 in 354 posts
Likes Given: 4
Joined: Sep 2020
(02-08-2024, 07:36 PM)F Gump Wrote: Bad guess! ^ There was no 3-way deal, instead it was separate.
By the time we get to 2028 I may feel differently, but at the moment I'm pleasantly surprised by the trade with OKC.
The Mavs only gave up a pick swap (which, in optimistic scenarios, isn't even exercised). In return, they will end up with not only a 2028 FRP but also a 2024 FRP. And that 2024 FRP had enough value to turn Holmes into Gafford, so it was definitely valuable. Valuable enough! You could even look at it like a pick swap that could never happen for Gafford and Omax
Posts: 13,246
Threads: 327
Likes Received: 4,845 in 2,753 posts
Likes Given: 2,854
Likes Received: 4,845 in 2,753 posts
Likes Given: 2,854
Joined: Sep 2019
02-09-2024, 04:10 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024, 04:11 AM by SleepingHero.)
(02-08-2024, 04:33 PM)omahen Wrote: Since 2027 is protected, I guess it turns into 2028 SRP if it doesn't convert. So Mavs can't trade that SRP pick. They can trade remaining 3 SRP and if 2024 pick converts to NY, they will also be able to trade 2025 SRP which is locked at the moment by the 2024 pick protections.
I don't remember reading anywhere in the trade that if the 2027 doesn't convert it turns into a 2028 2nd.
Just cause it's protected doesn't mean the Mavs have to replace the asset if it doesn't convert. Of course it helps and adds value, but I haven't seen it written yet. Since it hasn't even been mentioned by Woj or Shams I assume there are no other stipulations on that 2027 FRP. In the doomsday scenario the Mavs get the 2027 first, then CHA is left with nada.
14x All-Star, 12x all-NBA, 1x MVP, 1x Finals MVP, 1 NBA Championship: Dirk Nowitzki, the man, the myth, the legend.
Posts: 4,082
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 3,991 in 1,476 posts
Likes Given: 2,074
Likes Received: 3,991 in 1,476 posts
Likes Given: 2,074
Joined: Sep 2019
02-09-2024, 07:56 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024, 08:18 AM by DanSchwartzgan.)
(02-09-2024, 04:10 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: I don't remember reading anywhere in the trade that if the 2027 doesn't convert it turns into a 2028 2nd.
Just cause it's protected doesn't mean the Mavs have to replace the asset if it doesn't convert. Of course it helps and adds value, but I haven't seen it written yet. Since it hasn't even been mentioned by Woj or Shams I assume there are no other stipulations on that 2027 FRP. In the doomsday scenario the Mavs get the 2027 first, then CHA is left with nada.
Just because we don’t have that detail yet, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. It wouldn’t surprise me if it converts to two 2028’s or a 27 and a 28 (since we now have them to give). Back in the summer when we got the 2028 second I thought its purpose to be a fallback for a trade involving a protected 2027 pick. Lindsey (presumably) doing a great job at designing moves in anticipation of future moves.
Posts: 7,821
Threads: 71
Likes Received: 1,765 in 1,221 posts
Likes Given: 2,745
Likes Received: 1,765 in 1,221 posts
Likes Given: 2,745
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-09-2024, 07:56 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Just because we don’t have that detail yet, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. It wouldn’t surprise me if it converts to two 2028’s (since we now have two of them). Back in the summer when we got the 2028 second I thought its purpose to be a fallback for a trade involving a protected 2027 pick. Lindsey (presumably) doing a great job at designing moves in anticipation of future moves. If it is a stipulation, it’ll most likely come out before the time when we start looking at offseason trades. As of now, with nothing reported, we have 5 SRPs to trade.
Posts: 13
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 37
Likes Received: 5 in 2 posts
Likes Given: 37
Joined: Jul 2020
02-09-2024, 08:55 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024, 08:55 AM by ACMFFL.)
So didnt those two CHA 2nds go to Washington, right?
Posts: 7,821
Threads: 71
Likes Received: 1,765 in 1,221 posts
Likes Given: 2,745
Likes Received: 1,765 in 1,221 posts
Likes Given: 2,745
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-09-2024, 08:55 AM)ACMFFL Wrote: So didnt those two CHA 2nds go to Washington, right? Nope.
Posts: 7,854
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 3,908 in 2,118 posts
Likes Given: 1,090
Likes Received: 3,908 in 2,118 posts
Likes Given: 1,090
Joined: Sep 2019
02-09-2024, 10:34 AM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024, 10:51 AM by dirkfansince1998.)
First time that Gafford is playing for a non tanking team. Hard to evaluate his career up to this point. Just hope that he isn't Whiteside 2.0. His +/- impact on defense hasn't been good but I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt because he played next to some of the worst defenders in the league. His DFG% at the rim isn't as good as his block numbers suggest (same with Lively).
Really hope that on a competitive team he is more Tyson Chandler and less Hassan Whiteside. I guess we will find out in the coming months.
Posts: 4,082
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 3,991 in 1,476 posts
Likes Given: 2,074
Likes Received: 3,991 in 1,476 posts
Likes Given: 2,074
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-09-2024, 10:34 AM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: First time that Gafford is playing for a non tanking team. Hard to evaluate his career up to this point. Just hope that he isn't Whiteside 2.0. His +/- impact on defense hasn't been good but I am willing to give him the benefit of the doubt because he played next to some of the worst defenders in the league. His DFG% at the rim isn't as good as his block numbers suggest (same with Lively).
Really hope that on a competitive team he is more Tyson Chandler and less Hassan Whiteside. I guess we will find out in the coming months.
We are 10 points worse defensively any time Lively and Powell are off the floor. So, those minutes are now gone. Relative to the Powell minutes, he rebounds, blocks and defends shots in the paint better than Powell and he’s harder to push around than Powell. Some of this has to be eye test until we see the actual product, but the eye test infers he’s better at pretty much everything near the basket than Powell. The harder test to evaluate is the part away from the basket (switching, drop coverage). Time will tell, but logic says this will be an improvement.
Posts: 13,246
Threads: 327
Likes Received: 4,845 in 2,753 posts
Likes Given: 2,854
Likes Received: 4,845 in 2,753 posts
Likes Given: 2,854
Joined: Sep 2019
(@GrantAfseth)
Luka Doncic on trade additions of P.J. Washington and Daniel Gafford: "I think we've got two really good players. We added some size to our team. We add a backup center, which I wanted [for] like three years already. So, I think both players really going to help us out a lot."
14x All-Star, 12x all-NBA, 1x MVP, 1x Finals MVP, 1 NBA Championship: Dirk Nowitzki, the man, the myth, the legend.
Posts: 7,854
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 3,908 in 2,118 posts
Likes Given: 1,090
Likes Received: 3,908 in 2,118 posts
Likes Given: 1,090
Joined: Sep 2019
02-09-2024, 12:16 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-09-2024, 12:57 PM by dirkfansince1998.)
(02-09-2024, 11:58 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: We are 10 points worse defensively any time Lively and Powell are off the floor. So, those minutes are now gone. Relative to the Powell minutes, he rebounds, blocks and defends shots in the paint better than Powell and he’s harder to push around than Powell. Some of this has to be eye test until we see the actual product, but the eye test infers he’s better at pretty much everything near the basket than Powell. The harder test to evaluate is the part away from the basket (switching, drop coverage). Time will tell, but logic says this will be an improvement.
Glass half empty. Last time Gafford wasn't a negative in defensive on/off was his rookie season. I really hope that it's just about him playing next to Kuzma and Poole but I am not as convinced as others on this board that just because he is a shot blocker the defense is going to be better. Have seen too many players that chased blocks/rebounds instead of playing good team defense. I haven't seen enough of Gafford to make the call but the numbers are at least somewhat concerning.
Glass half full. He has all the tools to make an impact and for the first time in his career his on court performance actually matters. He is playing on a winning team. As we saw last season selfish/lazy defenders like McGee will quickly lose their spot in the rotation. So I am going to assume that Gafford will embrace his new role.
Posts: 1,771
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 598 in 340 posts
Likes Given: 3,334
Likes Received: 598 in 340 posts
Likes Given: 3,334
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-09-2024, 12:16 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Glass half empty. Last time Gafford wasn't a negative in defensive on/off was his rookie season. I really hope that it's just about him playing next to Kuzma and Poole but I am not as convinced as others on this board that just because he is a shot blocker the defense is going to be better. Have seen too many players that chased blocks/rebounds instead of playing good team defense. I haven't seen enough of Gafford to make the call but the numbers are at least somewhat concerning.
Glass half full. He has all the tools to make an impact and for the first time in his career his on court performance actually matters. He is playing on a winning team. As we saw last season selfish/lazy defenders like McGee will quickly lose their spot in the rotation. So I am going to assume that Gafford will embrace his new role.
Gafford sure seems to move well and is athletic so the ability to play defense is there. Hopefully him and Washington buy into giving 100% on the defensive end. I can see Gafford and Lively helping each other get better.
Posts: 4,706
Threads: 19
Likes Received: 1,045 in 602 posts
Likes Given: 3,208
Likes Received: 1,045 in 602 posts
Likes Given: 3,208
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-09-2024, 02:50 PM)BigDirk41 Wrote: Gafford sure seems to move well and is athletic so the ability to play defense is there. Hopefully him and Washington buy into giving 100% on the defensive end. I can see Gafford and Lively helping each other get better.
The problem is, of course, that Kidd's defensive scheme is generally abominable, so executing it well and vigorously may still produce less-than-desired results.
Posts: 1,134
Threads: 3
Likes Received: 607 in 363 posts
Likes Given: 2,224
Likes Received: 607 in 363 posts
Likes Given: 2,224
Joined: Mar 2020
(02-09-2024, 02:50 PM)BigDirk41 Wrote: Gafford sure seems to move well and is athletic so the ability to play defense is there. Hopefully him and Washington buy into giving 100% on the defensive end. I can see Gafford and Lively helping each other get better.
I have a lot of confidence that Kidd can get them to understand and perform well in their new roles.
He’s a player’s coach.
Posts: 4,706
Threads: 19
Likes Received: 1,045 in 602 posts
Likes Given: 3,208
Likes Received: 1,045 in 602 posts
Likes Given: 3,208
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-09-2024, 04:01 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: I have a lot of confidence that Kidd can get them to understand and perform well in their new roles.
He’s a player’s coach.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL so is Doc Rivers. X's and O's matter.
|