12-23-2022, 12:21 PM
(12-23-2022, 12:16 PM)F Gump Wrote: So Wood's "on/off" is not a measure of "outscored the opponent" AND it takes a different number to tell us whether that did or did not occur. Got it.
I would at least expect an "oops, you're right, I messed up in how I used these numbers" and "oops, I shouldn't deride others for misusing stats, because I can make that mistake myself," but I don't see it. Oh well.