Posts: 10,951
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,247 in 3,547 posts
Likes Given: 376
Likes Received: 6,247 in 3,547 posts
Likes Given: 376
Joined: Oct 2020
Who knows if it will work, but Marshall really pushing the "stay in Dallas" wish. Most players are not very vocal. Marshall is letting it be known publicly
https://x.com/RonKnowsSports/status/2018686216988672397
Posts: 2,333
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 1,896 in 973 posts
Likes Given: 2,326
Likes Received: 1,896 in 973 posts
Likes Given: 2,326
Joined: Jul 2022
(02-03-2026, 02:24 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: Who knows if it will work, but Marshall really pushing the "stay in Dallas" wish. Most players are not very vocal. Marshall is letting it be known publicly
https://x.com/RonKnowsSports/status/2018686216988672397
It seems like the Mavs really like having Kyrie Irving and Naji Marshall around. (even though they might not fit the Flagg timeline)
Posts: 2,818
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 1,342 in 745 posts
Likes Given: 7,657
Likes Received: 1,342 in 745 posts
Likes Given: 7,657
Joined: Sep 2019
I like Naji, but he needs to learn to shoot if he's going to stay.
Posts: 2,154
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,298 in 751 posts
Likes Given: 3,510
Likes Received: 1,298 in 751 posts
Likes Given: 3,510
Joined: Mar 2020
(02-03-2026, 03:26 PM)BigDirk41 Wrote: I like Naji, but he needs to learn to shoot if he's going to stay.
Naji:
53.8% FG
30.4% 3FG
Flagg:
48.4% FG
28.9% 3FG
Posts: 5,630
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,172 in 2,643 posts
Likes Given: 3,520
Likes Received: 5,172 in 2,643 posts
Likes Given: 3,520
Joined: Dec 2020
(02-03-2026, 03:36 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Naji:
53.8% FG
30.4% 3FG
Flagg:
48.4% FG
28.9% 3FG
What is your point? Flagg shooting issues and dominance in the paint is why you want a forward who can shoot. Unless you are suggesting we should trade Flagg?
Posts: 2,154
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,298 in 751 posts
Likes Given: 3,510
Likes Received: 1,298 in 751 posts
Likes Given: 3,510
Joined: Mar 2020
(02-03-2026, 03:45 PM)mvossman Wrote: What is your point? Flagg shooting issues and dominance in the paint is why you want a forward who can shoot. Unless you are suggesting we should trade Flagg?
We can complain about Naji’s shooting, but it’s not really that bad. And if we’re fair, we should be complaining even more about Cooper’s, although nobody is.
I prefer to see it as a double threat: two guys with size who can handle the ball and relentlessly drive to the hoop. This puts incredible pressure on a defense.
So they shoot 30% instead of 35% from three. On average, less than 1 point per game difference. I can live with that, if I’m generating the kind of production around the hoop that they both do.
Posts: 5,630
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,172 in 2,643 posts
Likes Given: 3,520
Likes Received: 5,172 in 2,643 posts
Likes Given: 3,520
Joined: Dec 2020
(02-03-2026, 03:51 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: We can complain about Naji’s shooting, but it’s not really that bad. And if we’re fair, we should be complaining even more about Cooper’s, although nobody is.
I prefer to see it as a double threat: two guys with size who can handle the ball and relentlessly drive to the hoop. This puts incredible pressure on a defense.
So they shoot 30% instead of 35% from three. On average, less than 1 point per game difference. I can live with that, if I’m generating the kind of production around the hoop that they both do.
That's not how it works. Teams can sag off Naji because they don't mind him taking 3's. That clogs up the paint for Flagg. Flagg would be better served next to guys who demand guarding at the perimeter, giving him more space to operate.
Nobody is complaining about Flagg shooting because he is the youngest player in the NBA and already awesome. Rookies generally struggle from 3 in their first year and the hope is that he will improve (given his work ethic and skill, its likely). We are building this team around Flagg, not Naji Marshall.
Posts: 2,818
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 1,342 in 745 posts
Likes Given: 7,657
Likes Received: 1,342 in 745 posts
Likes Given: 7,657
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-03-2026, 03:36 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Naji:
53.8% FG
30.4% 3FG
Flagg:
48.4% FG
28.9% 3FG
What in the world are you showing that stat for? You should be embarrassed for even posting that.
Posts: 2,154
Threads: 8
Likes Received: 1,298 in 751 posts
Likes Given: 3,510
Likes Received: 1,298 in 751 posts
Likes Given: 3,510
Joined: Mar 2020
(02-03-2026, 04:05 PM)BigDirk41 Wrote: What in the world are you showing that stat for? You should be embarrassed for even posting that.
Yeah, super embarrassed. Reminds me of the time I peed my pants at school.
Posts: 4,387
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 5,189 in 2,202 posts
Likes Given: 4,511
Likes Received: 5,189 in 2,202 posts
Likes Given: 4,511
Joined: Nov 2020
(02-03-2026, 03:51 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: We can complain about Naji’s shooting, but it’s not really that bad. And if we’re fair, we should be complaining even more about Cooper’s, although nobody is.
I prefer to see it as a double threat: two guys with size who can handle the ball and relentlessly drive to the hoop. This puts incredible pressure on a defense.
So they shoot 30% instead of 35% from three. On average, less than 1 point per game difference. I can live with that, if I’m generating the kind of production around the hoop that they both do.
Naji has value, but to play him WITH Cooper, he needs to hit 3s to open the floor. Even if CF gets better at 3s, you want the floor spaced for all the things he can do. This season, with a lost year, it's not a worry that there's no spacing. But it will be, and hopefully soon.
Naji makes a great backup for CF, someone who can get you a basket when the main scorers are getting a break. But he needs to get better on 3s so he can play more. Or, go.
Posts: 5,630
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,172 in 2,643 posts
Likes Given: 3,520
Likes Received: 5,172 in 2,643 posts
Likes Given: 3,520
Joined: Dec 2020
(02-03-2026, 04:27 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: Yeah, super embarrassed. Reminds me of the time I peed my pants at school.
Ok, I lol'd.
Posts: 678
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 206 in 153 posts
Likes Given: 655
Likes Received: 206 in 153 posts
Likes Given: 655
Joined: Jun 2023
02-03-2026, 07:51 PM
(This post was last modified: 02-03-2026, 10:40 PM by RGP1981.)
(02-03-2026, 03:45 PM)mvossman Wrote: What is your point? Flagg shooting issues and dominance in the paint is why you want a forward who can shoot. Unless you are suggesting we should trade Flagg?
Hmm...
How about Cooper + filler for JJJ or Markkanen + (what?)?
- Kyrie/Nembhard/BWill, Christie/Klay, PJW/Naji, JJJ or Lauri, AD/Lively or Gafford
- Trade Gafford or Lively for another quality SG.
Posts: 2,395
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 1,317 in 789 posts
Likes Given: 402
Likes Received: 1,317 in 789 posts
Likes Given: 402
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 2,395
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 1,317 in 789 posts
Likes Given: 402
Likes Received: 1,317 in 789 posts
Likes Given: 402
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,387
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 5,189 in 2,202 posts
Likes Given: 4,511
Likes Received: 5,189 in 2,202 posts
Likes Given: 4,511
Joined: Nov 2020
Quick napkin numbers. If my quick calc are accurate --
Mavs now have about 7.5M in room under the cap line.
They also should have TPE for 19Mish and 6M.
In the summer they will start at about the cap, with about 35M under the tax line.
They do have opportunity to perhaps use a TPE now as a facilitator, and pick up a pick. Or even go back over the tax line, offering BIG help for even more salary. Either way they won't be paying repeater tax (or any tax) next season.
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,072 in 580 posts
Likes Given: 1,625
Likes Received: 1,072 in 580 posts
Likes Given: 1,625
Joined: Sep 2019
IMO, that got rid of the salary burden and the deadwood in one deal!
A few weeks ago I was wishing Martin would go, but he's been useful in some games lately.
Posts: 1,902
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,072 in 580 posts
Likes Given: 1,625
Likes Received: 1,072 in 580 posts
Likes Given: 1,625
Joined: Sep 2019
(02-04-2026, 02:37 PM)F Gump Wrote: Quick napkin numbers. If my quick calc are accurate --
Mavs now have about 7.5M in room under the cap line.
They also should have TPE for 19Mish and 6M.
In the summer they will start at about the cap, with about 35M under the tax line.
They do have opportunity to perhaps use a TPE now as a facilitator, and pick up a pick. Or even go back over the tax line, offering BIG help for even more salary. Either way they won't be paying repeater tax (or any tax) next season.
I was just looking at the salary chart on Sportrac. Looks like the trade puts DAL at roughly $196.2M total, $41.6M over the cap, $10.5M under A1 and $22.4 under A2.
But it looks to open waaay up once this season is over.
I bow to your expertise on TPEs.
Posts: 4,387
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 5,189 in 2,202 posts
Likes Given: 4,511
Likes Received: 5,189 in 2,202 posts
Likes Given: 4,511
Joined: Nov 2020
(02-04-2026, 02:49 PM)michaeltex Wrote: I was just looking at the salary chart on Sportrac. Looks like the trade puts DAL at roughly $196.2M total, $41.6M over the cap, $10.5M under A1 and $22.4 under A2.
But it looks to open waaay up once this season is over.
I bow to your expertise on TPEs.
Spotrac was a mixed bag for a while - they still had AD on the Mavs list. But now that it's updated, they show Mavs at 180+M (7.6M below the tax line) right now.
Posts: 2,333
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 1,896 in 973 posts
Likes Given: 2,326
Likes Received: 1,896 in 973 posts
Likes Given: 2,326
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 19,804
Threads: 69
Likes Received: 12,394 in 6,390 posts
Likes Given: 13,339
Likes Received: 12,394 in 6,390 posts
Likes Given: 13,339
Joined: Aug 2020
(02-04-2026, 05:36 PM)RoyTarpleysGhost Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/sgcd7NavuyE
In the wake of today's trade...honestly, doesn't it kind of feel like we have permission to get more excited about this? I can't quite figure out why, but it feels that way for me.
|