Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MAVS 94, KINGS 95
#26
(12-30-2021, 12:07 PM)cow Wrote: It might not equate to better shots but it might have a positive effect on the team by getting more people touching the ball on the offensive end and not having players standing around and watching.  And it's not like the normal rotation can't do that as I recall a game earlier in the season where the ball movement really stood out.  I wish I could remember the opponent but I remember thinking it was GSW-like.

Good points. I'm not saying more ball movement is a bad thing. It certainly contributes to basketball as a beautiful game, and can result in great shots. It's just not necessarily always a good thing, either. 

Also reporting iztok's response to the oft-made Mavs-specific comment that the ball moves more without Luka. The ball does move more, but the quality of the shots generated is often worse. And that moving the ball more is not usually a goal in and of itself, while making shots is.
[-] The following 4 users Like mavsluvr's post:
  • DallasMaverick, dirkfansince1998, fifteenth, mvossman
Like Reply


Messages In This Thread
MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 02:00 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by BackToSquareOne - 12-30-2021, 02:57 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by burekemde - 12-30-2021, 05:47 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 11:12 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by ThisIStheYear - 12-30-2021, 07:28 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by omahen - 12-30-2021, 07:47 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 11:21 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by RedFlag41 - 12-30-2021, 07:47 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 11:27 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by Chicagojk - 12-30-2021, 11:38 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-31-2021, 07:49 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by fifteenth - 12-31-2021, 09:23 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by cow - 12-31-2021, 01:25 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by HoosierDaddyKid - 12-30-2021, 08:42 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by Chicagojk - 12-30-2021, 09:05 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by HoosierDaddyKid - 12-30-2021, 09:29 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by Kammrath - 12-30-2021, 10:07 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by dirkfansince1998 - 12-30-2021, 11:26 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by vfromlmf - 12-30-2021, 10:12 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 10:26 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by KillerLeft - 12-30-2021, 10:53 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 10:57 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by KillerLeft - 12-30-2021, 11:02 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 11:43 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by cow - 12-30-2021, 11:49 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 11:56 AM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by cow - 12-30-2021, 12:07 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 12:19 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by BackToSquareOne - 12-30-2021, 01:38 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 02:00 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 12:04 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by LukTheShadow - 12-30-2021, 12:59 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by SleepingHero - 12-30-2021, 01:26 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by Fuerza1 - 12-30-2021, 02:58 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by BackToSquareOne - 12-30-2021, 03:51 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 03:03 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by TXBamanut - 12-30-2021, 05:18 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 05:36 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by TXBamanut - 12-30-2021, 07:04 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by luka_skywalker_77 - 12-30-2021, 06:02 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by omahen - 12-30-2021, 05:36 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 05:38 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 06:08 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by dirkfansince1998 - 12-30-2021, 06:15 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by mavsluvr - 12-30-2021, 07:20 PM
RE: MAVS 94, KINGS 95 - by cow - 12-30-2021, 06:50 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)