07-23-2020, 08:54 AM
I don't understand how Ingram would be considered as more improved player than Doncic. His stats increased but in smaller absolute values than Luka's. For example, Ingram has 6 ppg higher average than last year while Luka has almost 8 ppg. It is of course much more difficult to go from 21 ppg to 29 ppg than from 18 to 24. Imho at least. Both players improved other categories by similar margins. Ingram is on a much worse team and it could be even argued if he is really the most important player on his team. I just don't understand the metric used behind this decision. I would have much less problems accepting someone like Graham or Wood (from zero relevance to very good player) in front of Luka.