(07-13-2021, 01:34 PM)mvossman Wrote: what stood out was Luka getting worn down by the 4th quarter, the other 4 starters struggling to take advantage of 4 on 3 when Luka was doubled, and the bench generally sucking when Luka was not on the court
Luka WAS worn down....because of conditioning and diet IMO primarily AND because he had to create so much ONE ON ONE because he didn't have an elite pick and roll man.
Yes, the other starters failed because there was no rim runner to pressure the D "vertically" (like JC or RH) nor a guy who could get his shot inside (like JC is really good at if you allow him).
Yes, the bench was awful when Luka wasn't in. JC is someone who is capable of having some offense worked through him when Luka is on the bench. His inside and midrange game is underrated IMO.
And yes, the D was awful....KP of the main rotation guys was by FAR the worst, being -8.8 defensively on/off. I think JC and RH would have both massively improved the D of the Mavs.
JC/RH accomplish these things:
1) They EASE the burden on Luka by actually being guys who set good screens AND demand the defense's attention AND cannot just be switched against (because they will punish smaller guys inside). THIS is what Luka needs, not to stand in the corner or at half court without the ball.
2) They make the rest of the starters better and give them more space by spacing the floor "vertically."
3) JC would help make Luka's resting time better if you allow him to be a focal point offensively with some bench guys.
4) They massively improve the D by being bigs who are switchable AND an interior presence.