04-02-2021, 11:52 AM
(04-02-2021, 11:13 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I find your 23 for 22 thing to be creative and more interesting than some of the other ideas I've seen for fixing the 23 issue. Well done.
Why would the Knicks do that???
As I mentioned above, they have incentive to reject it.
A-It puts early expiry time on their asset: since they turned from a young team, into competitive one , they most likely view it as trade asset rather than a pick they will use, either way they better served waiting on it rather than being rushed one year earlier.
B-They would know we will then use our nrw flexibility for trades to improve the team, which is the opposite of what they want, the worse the Mavs, the better the pick for Knicks.
Unless we are sending extra asset, I really don't get the Knicks angle to accept such move.