(12-28-2019, 04:03 PM)omahen Wrote: Yes. Exum is a no risk move for Cleveland. They have plenty of time to experiment and if he works out, great. He is still young. Cleveland have a higher need for low usage defensive player next to Sexton and Garland than Clarkson. If he doesn't work out, who cares. Orlando paid a freaking first to get Fultz last season. For Utah being on a win now mode on the other hand, Exum was a terrible contract.No risk move does not mean value. Exum has no value. Sure, they have the cap space to get him and hope he turns out to be a good get, but the value is not there right now.
(12-28-2019, 04:03 PM)omahen Wrote: Wright is a back up point guard. Mavs wanted him to start but he prefers to be back up. He is nothing special and he is not a very good point guard. He is excellent on defense. If you can get Ntilikina for a couple of second rounders, I guess developing teams might prefer that option.He's still the same player that showed he can start in Mem and be effective. He is really good here too. I read him to want to be on the bench so he could play with a group that was more "his" group as opposed to with Luka who the starters are his group. If he meant he wants to come off the bench no matter what, you have a point.
(12-28-2019, 04:03 PM)omahen Wrote: JJ fell out of 10 man rotation in Dallas and you are selling him as a starter to Minny? Are you sure they are going to buy that story?Who's selling him on anything? RoCo is a wing, when you subtract a wing, getting a wing to replace the number of wings you have is probably a good idea. It's a numbers thing, not a role thing. The coach can decide when he plays that is of no concern to me.
Edit: Also, you talk about Dante Exum being a good get and yet JJ is not?