12-13-2022, 01:03 AM
(This post was last modified: 12-13-2022, 01:04 AM by KillerLeft.)
(12-13-2022, 12:49 AM)cow Wrote: Counter: It depends on the cost of the acquisition.
Sure, that's valid.
I'm just saying, the best teams are organized in such a way where their 5-7 (and ideally more than that) best players happen to fit well together.
All of this "he fits with that guy, but not so well with him" isn't going to get it done in the long run. A truly great team, if, say, they want to go smaller, well, they can just remove their center and add a bench guard or forward to the mix and create a completely new dynamic with that one substitution, BUT they all still know how to play together because it's only a minor change (and they've probably been together for a while, honestly).
It's late so I'm probably not articulating this so well. But, I think we've talked a ton this summer about "flexibility" and I think we've been drastically missing the boat on what type of flexibility is actually advantageous. What you want is to have individual players with flexibility (like Luka, Kleber, DFS) who can be mixed and matched in different combos to create flexibility through play style, but while still playing your best players.