11-05-2019, 12:52 PM
(11-05-2019, 12:34 PM)omahen Wrote: Lee is a bad salary, he is not an asset and will not become an asset. If someone is willing to give asset (plus bad salary) for him it is great. We will not have cap space next summer so we don't care at all if we get 2 years of bad salary. Or do you think it is better to just let him expire? THJ is also bad salary - if we can get more productive player with bad salary for him, I am considering it. We will certainly not get a productive player on good salary.
The Mavs might agree with you, but I think there are other possibilities. I'm not a cap/trade expert by any means, but I'd rather use their expiring deals to help make the money work in a deal where we help a team come off longer term salary. But longer term salary that another team wants to come off of doesn't have to be bad salary. It just might be that the player doesn't fit their timeline. If you start asking me for examples I'll have to bow out, though. I'm already starting to feel a bit over my head here.
(11-05-2019, 12:34 PM)omahen Wrote: I didn't critisize what you said. I said I have a different opinion.
"Critique" doesn't really have the same base connotation as the word "criticize" currently has. I could have used "evaluation" instead.
cri·tique
/kriˈtēk/
noun
a detailed analysis and assessment of something, especially a literary, philosophical, or political theory.
verb
evaluate (a theory or practice) in a detailed and analytical way.
"the authors critique the methods and practices used in the research"
"the authors critique the methods and practices used in the research"