05-10-2020, 02:41 PM
(05-10-2020, 12:37 PM)ThunderMav Wrote: ^^^
Because it had none beforehand. What I mean is you price out any cap reductions by an equal amount so teams are not unfairly penalized by things out of their control. Whatever the cal reduction is would be the number to use. And it would only apply to existing contracts not new ones. You basically reset to current year cap. Its a 1 for 1 reduction based on percent.
Otherwise no team can trade for existing players with some exceptions, otherwise it would kill their cap. Lets say they reduce cap by 30% and NY wants to trade for CP3. If they had to account for 100% of his current salary yet their cap is 30% less then CP3 would take up an even bigger chunk of their capspace. If his cap hit is also reduced 30% it matches the cap space the team has under any new reduction. No one is gaining anything its just keeping things in proportion. All new contracts would count for 100% only existing contracts would be reduced 1 for 1 cap space wise.
LOL yet it could happen. And the floors may be plastered with ads too. Backboard? Balls? I can see lots if creative ways they might use to get revenue
https://twitter.com/OKCTracker/status/12...2559529984
I don't think it is fair to let your Thunder get a boatload of picks for taking the CP3-contract and then just kind of waive the overpay.
The Players killed the balance in the league with the capspike I don't see the owners pay for the reduce. The freeagents will pay.
By the way I love the Adds on the Keepers butt in the HBL.