(12-18-2019, 07:28 AM)DanSchwartzman Wrote: That kind of thing seems a much more likely path than the incredibly disruptive 3 for 1's that were being proposed for Jrue yesterday.I would have no problem with the approach you suggested in just getting some more draft assets with the 2 assets we currently have (Lee and the TE) along with some soon to expire contracts that can be useful on the court so we have more assets in the summer. I also have no problem being opportunistic now with some of the names being floated out there.
If we could get 1 of Turner, Favors, Jrue with the player assets we would use this summer, I think that's all the better. You get half a season to see if they fit, then if they don't, you have them without losing much value plus the first rounder to use to find the guy you need.
I keep saying this, but better players are just better. We need 3 for 1 (and 1 serviceable bad contract, so 2) trades to make up the value for the guys we want and think will fit. I'm not saying get a star (I don't think Jrue, Turner or Favors are stars), I'm saying get an incrementally clear upgrade.