(12-17-2019, 07:08 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: An expiring + Jackson got Barnes last year.My thought on that trade is there aren't many FOs that would have made that deal unless an ultimatum was made that didn't go public (the not going public sounds like HB, but not an ultimatum).
The trade was for the biggest TE in NBA history and Jackson. Not sure what has more value though, the TE or an expiring. Depends on the want of the team in negotiation I suppose since the expiring can be combined with other players.
I mean, hey, if we can get Turner for that, I'm sooooo on board. I just think the proposal is undervaluing his pretty young talent on a very reasonable contract.
(edit) Also, this trade would mean we should be able to get Turner and Sampson with Lee +JJ+ GSW 2nd straight up. I myself don't think that is what Ind would accept in value.