10-08-2021, 01:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-08-2021, 01:23 PM by dirkfansince1998.)
(10-08-2021, 10:18 AM)Dahlsim Wrote: Take for example the language used here to put a favorable spin on relevant studies and news regarding vaccine adverse effects.
There really is no favorable or unfavorable spin. Just need to understand how MHRA data collection works (event reporting,not a study!!!) Why research needs to verify the individual events. Why we aren´t using it as factual evidence but as a source that can highlight potenial risks/problems that require further research/investigation. Understand the flaws and advantages of open reporting systems (risks of under/over reporting).
Same for VAERS or similar systems that exist in most developed countries.
And just to fight back against the suppression, lack of critical reporting argument. Systems like this lead to the discovery of side effects/complications. I already mentioned the most important Pfizer/Moderna related one. Pericarditis and Myocarditis cases spiking among younger men. Leading to adjusted vaccine guide lines in multiple countries. And an open debate among experts about the implications for potential vaccine programs for children.