07-29-2020, 09:38 AM
(07-29-2020, 08:32 AM)Hypermav Wrote: https://www.si.com/nba/2020/07/29/maveri...allegation
The Mavericks’ outside counsel, Winston & Strawn, meanwhile, maintained that whatever had happened had nothing to do with Ronzone’s job, rendering the team not liable. On Dec. 10, they sent a letter to Sarah’s attorneys arguing, “None of the conduct at the heart of [Sarah’s] allegations is even arguably within the nature and scope of Mr. Ronzone’s employment with the Mavericks.”
This was too long to read (in unnecessary way IMO) so I might have missed some details. But few things:
-Why did she go to the Mavs and not to police, it seems weird to me since this happened away from the Mavs as organization. I mean even if this happened it wasn't something the Mavs should be held responsible for.
-There is a lot of infos that goes forth and by between her claims and his lawyer, and I hope truth prevail between her and him. But regarding the Mavs I think it comes down to this:
Was the NDA situation rightfully handled by which side?
If her lawyer was playing tricks, then it is the Mavs right not to accept their request and they should have handled the evidence if they really wanted justice. If it was a formality and Mavs were trying to cover for him then we will be screwed. Though, with NBA being reported with this, and Mavs public situation I feel I am leaning to the side of the team regarding the legal situation (not the incident)
Though again, I might have missed something.
One last thing, I am not trying to victim blaming anyone here. But woman should learn to avoid going to a man's room like a plague. And the more he insists the more you should avoid it.