(05-24-2022, 06:09 AM)F Gump Wrote: Bullock is a keeper. Mavs are better off with the Bullock end of that equation. No benefit to paying Green for a season lost to injury (and he's not a trade match otherwise). BAD DEAL.
I am getting fed up with your comments. Not sure who put you in a position of a trade judge here, because this is basically what you do. I understand you don't need to agree with any idea but I would appreciate if you would provide an input of what you would do, not just what you wouldn't.
I would also appreciate if you would at least read the whole idea before commenting. I clearly said I see Philly as possible third team. So the deal is not Bullock for Green and assets but it is for Green and assets which are used for a player that is worth giving up Bullock for. Who would that be, I don't have idea atm.
And yes, Green is a trade match. You can't trade Bullock for Thybulle without additional salary included.