05-21-2022, 05:06 PM
(05-21-2022, 02:42 PM)mvossman Wrote: If you can't fluke your way into a shooting percentage with over 5 attempts a game for 70+ games then why are we not looking at his most recent season where he shot under 31% (which is way worse than any of our 3&D guys)? Its not like its because he is number one option. Most of his shots were open or wide open and his catch and shoot numbers were just as bad. His career percentage is 33 and so is his average over the last 3 seasons. It really looks like that season was a fluke.
Don't really think career average is good to use here. He was bad at it coming into the league and focused on developing it every season. The Knicks years are weird. This is where it's up to the FO to see if the situation/type of shots he was taking were out of rhythm etc. Dinwiddie is a career 32% 3pt shooter, is his 40% here a fluke? He's due for his regression to the mean and the Mavs should sell on him asap then. Regression to the mean is a pretty lazy take to me though generally.