04-07-2022, 08:22 PM
(04-07-2022, 03:17 PM)F Gump Wrote: Is Holmes good enough that you would take him, in a money dump deal? If he's not playable, his contract is kinda gagly. But one man's trash might be another's treasure.
Say a deal in June with something like Holmes to Dallas, and Brown + 1 of Chriss/Bobi + cash?
In noodling around the edges of what this team has in assets and how best to move forward, I keep wondering of something like that is the smart move. It allows Maxi to play at PF for less wear and tear, keeps your 2 shooters, and keeps the pick for someone young to put in the pipeline at a reduced cost. The downside is MC pays a lot of tax, but that's the price of talent.
It also opens the door to having another piece for potential use in a Gobert deal, sometime later, if Gobert is possibly put on the market.
Would you do that?
I think there are four versions of Holmes to Dallas that make sense on some level:
Maxi based deal (Sac Pro: He would fit well with Sabonis. Dallas Con: Bertans is our only real backup PF....draft one?)
Reggie based deal (Sac Pro: They need defensive wings. Dallas Con: Is Green fully ready to take over the role?)
THJ based deal (Sac Pro: A thinking man's version of Hield. Dallas Con: We have to take back an extra player to make the $ work)
TPE based deal (Sac Pro: They can get to a little over the MLE in cap room. Dallas Con: Is there one other than the LT cost to Cuban?)
FWIW in deal design, Sac. has a $4mm TPE. Trying to be realistic, do we have to swap 23 for 37 on top of an end of bench guy or two? To your point about Gobert, I think we'd be ripe for a consolidation trade of some kind. The depth chart of rotation quality players would be a bit crowded:
Holmes/Powell
DFS/Maxi-Bertans
Luka/THJ
Reggie/Green
Brunson/Dinwiddie
It will be challenging to feed all of those mouths.