04-07-2022, 12:10 PM
(04-07-2022, 01:22 AM)F Gump Wrote: Ok. Posting in a hurry is obviously not my strength!
Personally wouldn't trade Bullock either. Mavs finally get a 3-and-D guy, and then sell him (instead of looking for more)? I wouldn't. Mavs need as many 2=way players as they can get.
I agree that Bullock fits a position of need and it would make more sense to trade someone who does not really fit (see THJ). I do struggle a bit with calling Bullock a two way player. He hits threes at a good percentage, but at moderate volume and he does not really do anything else offensively. He is your classic 3&D guy and a middling one at that. On the other hand, I did a little exercise on this thread or another that suggested replacing Bullock with a true 2 way player was likely going to be very expensive.