02-17-2022, 03:02 PM
(02-17-2022, 01:48 PM)F Gump Wrote: I don't see the issue. I don't see players being overused. I don't see small ball, either, just regular-sized rotations with switchable players.It may work out that way after the trade, but it has been a revelation for me to read your take on MK being exclusively a C. Revelation both from the standpoint that you think he was pretrade, and that only a couple people challenges you on it.
DP 24 Maxi 24 (Chriss, Bobi)
DFS 30 Bertans 18
Bullock 30 Green 18 (Brown)
Brunson 30 (Franky) (THJ)
Dinwiddie 30
Luka 30 (Burke)
6 minutes unaccounted for at PG/SG, but easy to cover in many ways.
MK has been more exclusively a PF than anything else throughout his career.
He may have played a few minutes here and there as the only “big” on the floor, other than that, he has ALWAYS played with another “big” making him the PF.
I know, traditional positions are not a thing anymore, why make a depth chart if that is the case? Also there was so much talk about 2 C’s when Powell played with KP, then when the lineup switched to KP and MK it was a 1 C lineup. Never was there a time anyone challenged that til now and it goes by with so little resistance (dfs has put up some so far)?
I know, I know, semantics and all. I do get caught up in the semantics of it all, just weird to me what seems to be common knowledge is not so much so. Without challenging it, you’ll never know how common that knowledge was.