(02-14-2022, 09:57 PM)Omega_Supreme Wrote: Your point makes no sense, you are complaining about the return for KP but then turning around supporting a deal that would have netted us 2 expiring contracts.
What do you suppose we do with that cap space?
What if Brunson leaves?
Your point that the Toronto deal was the better deal makes no sense. I am just challenging your opinion on it because it makes no sense for roster building.
They turned KP into assets that can be tradeable or long term pieces while also giving themselves insurance going into the offseason.
In order:
-Who's complaining? Discussions aren't complaining.
-I wasn't aware expiring contracts couldn't be signed to new deals.
-I don't see either trade having much of an impact on Brunson staying or going. All reports say that he's happy to be in Dallas and Mark Cuban is confident he'll resign and he's fine paying the tax. Maybe Mark's willing to spend more if he let's one of the Toronto contract expires, which wouldn't be an option with the Washington contracts. Because, you know, there is more than one type of flexibility.
-You are welcome to disagree with me on the better deal and you'd be the expert on not making sense.
-They turned KP's bad contract into two smaller, bad contracts. Much like before, you are welcome to prefer one set of players of the others.
-I don't think the Toronto deal was there in the first place. Thus the filled in blanks which could be way off base.