(01-19-2022, 02:25 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: What is everyone's preference of DFS vs Bullock. I thought when we signed Bullock that probably meant DFS would eventually be moved or not resigned as Bullock was targeted by the new regime. I wanted to give a lot of time to get to know Bullock's game before I made a decision. Bullock has played better recently and I would still want to get a bigger sample size before I made a final determination. But so far, it has been a TKO in favor of DFS. Even if DFS comes in at 13-15 million per year. At this point, I would prefer to sign DFS and try to move off Bullock if there were tax considerations with the front office. I wouldn't expect any movement now and there is still a lot of time left in the season. But this offseason.....Thoughts?
Don't think of Bullock as a potential replacement. DFS can play the 4 (and does quite a bit). Bullock can't really play that role. Last year DFS was our only plus wing defender (Looking at Maxi as a big) and I think the goal was to bring in more perimeter defense (Bullock/Brown/Frank). I was never a fan of the Bullock contract but I don't think its an either/or with him and DFS. Personally I believe in order for this defense to perform at high level we need at least 2 of (Maxi/DFS/Bullock/Green/Frank) on the court at all times.