Posts: 4,514
Threads: 73
Likes Received: 1,541 in 857 posts
Likes Given: 2,841
Likes Received: 1,541 in 857 posts
Likes Given: 2,841
Joined: Sep 2019
(10-01-2021, 09:11 AM)KillerLeft Wrote: It feels like we're going to see players cut or traded for this reason and then some lawsuits about that in a year or so, doesn't it?
I had the same thought. If the player is already a bottom third of the roster guy, and was possibly on the bubble anyway, does that make it less likely that a court will entertain that case?
Posts: 1,862
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 861 in 484 posts
Likes Given: 520
Likes Received: 861 in 484 posts
Likes Given: 520
Joined: Sep 2019
I would like to voice my support for Mr. Burke’s personal decision, but also I don’t want him on the roster for basketball reasons lmao
"The Dallas Mavericks must do everything they can to get Olivier-Maxence Prosper."
- IamDougieFresh (05-20-2023, 04:39 AM)
Posts: 7,829
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 3,890 in 2,107 posts
Likes Given: 1,084
Likes Received: 3,890 in 2,107 posts
Likes Given: 1,084
Joined: Sep 2019
I was already on the trade/waive Burke train last season. He simply isn´t good enough to make an NBA roster. Basically has one solid month of play every 2-3 years. Just not enough when a team has younger and more talented options.
Posts: 4,484
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 618 in 328 posts
Likes Given: 621
Likes Received: 618 in 328 posts
Likes Given: 621
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 4,484
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 618 in 328 posts
Likes Given: 621
Likes Received: 618 in 328 posts
Likes Given: 621
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 145
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 152 in 74 posts
Likes Given: 431
Likes Received: 152 in 74 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: Dec 2020
(10-01-2021, 09:18 AM)fifteenth Wrote: I had the same thought. If the player is already a bottom third of the roster guy, and was possibly on the bubble anyway, does that make it less likely that a court will entertain that case?
There is no case. As long as all the rules in the CBA about guaranteed money, waivers, etc are followed, a team can cut a guy for basically any reason at all (racial or sexual discrimination being about the only exception). Multiple courts have already upheld vaccine mandates (in alignment with a century of precedent), so while the CBA means they can't fire him and get out of his money, they can certainly waive under CBA rules for being a locker room distraction because of his choices.
Posts: 14,686
Threads: 47
Likes Received: 7,059 in 3,916 posts
Likes Given: 8,766
Likes Received: 7,059 in 3,916 posts
Likes Given: 8,766
Joined: Aug 2020
(10-01-2021, 01:08 PM)Arioch Wrote: a team can cut a guy for basically any reason at all (racial or sexual discrimination being about the only exception). Multiple courts have already upheld vaccine mandates (in alignment with a century of precedent), so while the CBA means they can't fire him and get out of his money, they can certainly waive under CBA rules for being a locker room distraction because of his choices
This is interesting and helpful, thanks. So basically, you're saying the precedent has already been set and there's no reason to expect anything different in pro sports?
It makes sense, but then again, for whatever reason, the league doesn't feel comfortable applying the same mandates on players as it does to other team personnel. I assume this is because of the union, somehow, but I'm not totally sure.
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,324
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 473 in 279 posts
Likes Given: 772
Likes Received: 473 in 279 posts
Likes Given: 772
Joined: Sep 2019
(10-01-2021, 01:01 PM)Hypermav Wrote: https://twitter.com/townbrad/status/1443...49832?s=20
https://twitter.com/townbrad/status/1443...08228?s=20
https://twitter.com/townbrad/status/1443...18744?s=20
Thanks for posting these!
I observe KP getting abused by DP moving to the basket for a close shot.
I observe KP getting outworked by Brown for a rebound.
In neither case did KP show much lift off the floor.
Is this a concern or just scrimmage on the 3rd day of pre-season camp?
Also, think I heard someone dropping a F-bomb after the Luka 3pt basket. Hope to hear LOTS of that this season!
Posts: 145
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 152 in 74 posts
Likes Given: 431
Likes Received: 152 in 74 posts
Likes Given: 431
Joined: Dec 2020
(10-01-2021, 01:20 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: This is interesting and helpful, thanks. So basically, you're saying the precedent has already been set and there's no reason to expect anything different in pro sports?
It makes sense, but then again, for whatever reason, the league doesn't feel comfortable applying the same mandates on players as it does to other team personnel. I assume this is because of the union, somehow, but I'm not totally sure.
Yes, they've been clear it's because of the CBA. Union contracts have legal weight (and if you look around, the only lawsuits about companies requiring vaccination that have gotten any traction at all are attached to union contracts--like the teacher's union in New York or some police associations), so unless the union agrees to modifying the contract, the NBA can't impose a vaccine mandate. But the same contract gives teams the ability to waive players pretty much at-will--as long as the player gets their guaranteed money; so if the team can waive Burke simply because they don't like his on-court fit, they can certainly waive him because they feel his vaccination status is a detriment to team cohesion/health, etc.
Posts: 9,393
Threads: 25
Likes Received: 2,576 in 1,470 posts
Likes Given: 1,794
Likes Received: 2,576 in 1,470 posts
Likes Given: 1,794
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 119
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 70 in 41 posts
Likes Given: 3
Likes Received: 70 in 41 posts
Likes Given: 3
Joined: Sep 2019
lol nobody wants Trey Burke. Just eat the poor signing and waive him.
Posts: 2,317
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 1,261 in 511 posts
Likes Given: 1,081
Likes Received: 1,261 in 511 posts
Likes Given: 1,081
Joined: Oct 2019
10-01-2021, 03:08 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-01-2021, 03:10 PM by Tyler.)
(10-01-2021, 02:32 PM)omahen Wrote: https://hoopshype.com/2021/10/01/maveric...rke-trade/
Interesting. Well, at least it's pretty obvious who Dallas would prefer to shed to get down to 15.
I also bet there's a 2-for-1 deal to be had. Something like Burke/Terry for a more expensive player on an expiring deal (who would fit into the Richardson exception) could save Dallas a roster spot and save another team some money.
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 14,686
Threads: 47
Likes Received: 7,059 in 3,916 posts
Likes Given: 8,766
Likes Received: 7,059 in 3,916 posts
Likes Given: 8,766
Joined: Aug 2020
(10-01-2021, 02:31 PM)Arioch Wrote: Yes, they've been clear it's because of the CBA. Union contracts have legal weight (and if you look around, the only lawsuits about companies requiring vaccination that have gotten any traction at all are attached to union contracts--like the teacher's union in New York or some police associations), so unless the union agrees to modifying the contract, the NBA can't impose a vaccine mandate. But the same contract gives teams the ability to waive players pretty much at-will--as long as the player gets their guaranteed money; so if the team can waive Burke simply because they don't like his on-court fit, they can certainly waive him because they feel his vaccination status is a detriment to team cohesion/health, etc.
Super clear and helpful, thanks so much!
Posts: 5,891
Threads: 36
Likes Received: 434 in 262 posts
Likes Given: 942
Likes Received: 434 in 262 posts
Likes Given: 942
Joined: Sep 2019
Burke playing in China real soon confirmed...
Josh Green is a top 5 Mavs player...
|