08-02-2021, 02:18 PM
Kammrath4 yrs/$60M is a STEAL for RH IMO.
Hollinger's latest - not his theoretical analysis, but his look at the landscape - is that Homes could get squeezed by lack of suitors with money, and he opines that he could see RH "returning to Sacramento on an “Early Bird” deal for $11 million." That fits with reports they are offering him 4/50M.
Does that leave the door ajar for a possible opportunity at a number north of 50 but maybe not quite 60?
What's your analysis of the defensive comparison between Holmes and Portis? Most importantly, is it significant enough to outweigh the stretch element that Portis can offer, to a Luka-led offense?
It sure seems to me that, in an ideal world, the Mavs would be well-served to replace DP with Holmes (similar rim-runner O game), and KP with Portis (similar stretchy O game), and give them each 55-60M deals over 4 yrs in which you kinda get the same roles filled by way more cost-efficient options.
Hollinger's latest - not his theoretical analysis, but his look at the landscape - is that Homes could get squeezed by lack of suitors with money, and he opines that he could see RH "returning to Sacramento on an “Early Bird” deal for $11 million." That fits with reports they are offering him 4/50M.
Does that leave the door ajar for a possible opportunity at a number north of 50 but maybe not quite 60?
What's your analysis of the defensive comparison between Holmes and Portis? Most importantly, is it significant enough to outweigh the stretch element that Portis can offer, to a Luka-led offense?
It sure seems to me that, in an ideal world, the Mavs would be well-served to replace DP with Holmes (similar rim-runner O game), and KP with Portis (similar stretchy O game), and give them each 55-60M deals over 4 yrs in which you kinda get the same roles filled by way more cost-efficient options.