07-30-2021, 01:31 PM
(07-30-2021, 01:04 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: Maybe, and that's not a deal breaker, but after seeing they would trade the #9 and Bagley for Valancunas, either they didn't value the #9 at all or they valued Val way too much, or they see Bagley as that big a liability to get someone to take on. If its the last, they might need to send compensation our way!
I think that Sac-Mem alleged proposal makes no sense, there must be other pieces involved that were not mentioned. If you are Memphis and you have Sac offer of Bagley (9 mil) and #9 for Valanciunas and #17, do you really prefer 2 years of Adams and Bledsoe at 35 mil and #10? I am certain that offer was not on the table.