Posts: 11,472
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Joined: Oct 2020
(06-05-2026, 02:21 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: I want them to pick #9 and then get another pick in the 10-20 range. Far more exciting options at 17-20 than at 24-26. That would be awesome. I just fear that is going to be very expensive. As in future firsts or taking on a contract like Poetl. I think that will be too much for me to swallow.
Posts: 4,552
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 5,403 in 2,301 posts
Likes Given: 4,726
Likes Received: 5,403 in 2,301 posts
Likes Given: 4,726
Joined: Nov 2020
06-06-2026, 08:41 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2026, 08:47 AM by F Gump.)
Scattershooting some current thoughts about the draft ...
1 Acuff's total apathy on the defensive end is something I don't think will be "fixed" in the NBA. He is who he is.
2 I don't trust the reliability of the NJ-based writer who tells us the Mavs have "trade-up interest in Acuff." I suspect there are lots of exploratory calls being made by many teams as to the possibility and price to move up or down, but as they make those calls, no team is going to broadcast their actual preferences in such a potential move.
3 I can see a theoretical scenario I like in which Mavs would swap 9 for 12+17, but that scenario happening would be a real longshot. In it the teams ahead of them have picked a run of players they don't actually want, and there would still be at least 3 players still on the board they would love. On my board, that would have 5-8 used on players like Acuff, Mara, Yaxel, Flemings, Ament, Lopez, and OKC wanting to pick another.
4 But even if it fell like that, would OKC be sitting by the phone hoping for that deal?
5 Yes I would love another shot at a GOOD player in addition to 9, but I think adding that takes getting a pick in the top 20 by trade. Unfortunately I don't see any teams picking in the 10-20 range who would be chasing a win-now addition like the Mavs could be providing in a trade. Teams chasing a win-now addition have picks in the mid 20s or so, and I think the choices there will be way too iffy. The Mavs can already pick long shots at 30 and 48. Save the talent for something better.
6 The name that most intrigues me at 30 is de Larrea, but what we know of him is limited. From those snippets, I see him as Wagler-like.
Posts: 4,552
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 5,403 in 2,301 posts
Likes Given: 4,726
Likes Received: 5,403 in 2,301 posts
Likes Given: 4,726
Joined: Nov 2020
(06-05-2026, 02:21 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: I want them to pick #9 and then get another pick in the 10-20 range. Far more exciting options at 17-20 than at 24-26.
I agree with all of that 100%, but don't think the specific teams sitting 10-20 are going to be prioritizing win-now trades, sadly.
Posts: 6,973
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 1,476 in 1,076 posts
Likes Given: 1,633
Likes Received: 1,476 in 1,076 posts
Likes Given: 1,633
Joined: Oct 2019
06-06-2026, 08:59 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2026, 09:05 AM by HoosierDaddyKid.)
Although he's listed at only 6'2, Stanford's Ebuka Okorie is getting some buzz on a lot of teams' draft boards. Led the ACC in scoring at 23.2 ppg.
Is he another Darius Acuff Jr.? I could see him being a late 1st or early 2nd-round pick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc3bahHzw68
Posts: 3,593
Threads: 42
Likes Received: 3,653 in 1,743 posts
Likes Given: 3,873
Likes Received: 3,653 in 1,743 posts
Likes Given: 3,873
Joined: Oct 2019
(06-06-2026, 08:59 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Although he's listed at only 6'2. Stanford's Ebuka Okorie is getting some buzz on a lot of teams' draft boards. Led the ACC in scoring at 23.2 ppg.
Is he another Darius Acuff Jr?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc3bahHzw68
He’s legit! The combine was big for him. At least for us fans/talking heads. I/We thought he was 5’11-6’0…. Being over 6’1 barefoot, with that +WS, it definitely got my attention, and have since moved him up the board.
Once talked about as a Mavs target at 30, I think he has a chance to go Top-20 when it’s all said and done.
Posts: 11,472
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Joined: Oct 2020
06-06-2026, 11:23 AM
(This post was last modified: 06-06-2026, 11:24 AM by Chicagojk.)
Like the other guards he has his weaknesses, but I think he has the same makeup as Castle. Probably won’t be as good due to size but I think he will impact winning.
https://x.com/rayyknowsball/status/20631...62522?s=46
Posts: 6,003
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Joined: Dec 2020
(06-06-2026, 08:59 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Although he's listed at only 6'2, Stanford's Ebuka Okorie is getting some buzz on a lot of teams' draft boards. Led the ACC in scoring at 23.2 ppg.
Is he another Darius Acuff Jr.? I could see him being a late 1st or early 2nd-round pick.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kc3bahHzw68
I don't think he is another Acuff. He is more scorer than pure PG. His defense is not as bad as Acuff but I think his likely outcome is 6th man. I would love him at 30 but I don't think there is any chance he falls that far.
Posts: 582
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Joined: Feb 2022
I'm starting to really like Mikel Brown. I feel he has the highest ceiling as an offensive player out of all the guards who may be there at our pick. I don't really love Burries if all the point guards are gone, but I'd understand the pick.
Posts: 10,456
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 4,489 in 2,611 posts
Likes Given: 392
Likes Received: 4,489 in 2,611 posts
Likes Given: 392
Joined: Sep 2019
(06-06-2026, 11:23 AM)Chicagojk Wrote: Like the other guards he has his weaknesses, but I think he has the same makeup as Castle. Probably won’t be as good due to size but I think he will impact winning.
https://x.com/rayyknowsball/status/20631...62522?s=46
Sold!
Posts: 6,003
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Joined: Dec 2020
(06-06-2026, 12:03 PM)Dirknows Wrote: I'm starting to really like Mikel Brown. I feel he has the highest ceiling as an offensive player out of all the guards who may be there at our pick. I don't really love Burries if all the point guards are gone, but I'd understand the pick.
I think its interesting how close the 5 guards are. They span a spectrum of high offensive upside vs high defensive floor in the order below:
Acuff
Brown
Wagler
Flemings
Burries
I would be fine with any of them.
Posts: 296
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 283 in 147 posts
Likes Given: 46
Likes Received: 283 in 147 posts
Likes Given: 46
Joined: Oct 2019
(06-06-2026, 12:03 PM)Dirknows Wrote: I'm starting to really like Mikel Brown. I feel he has the highest ceiling as an offensive player out of all the guards who may be there at our pick. I don't really love Burries if all the point guards are gone, but I'd understand the pick.
MB is legit. He’s got all the tools. He’ll be a little inconsistent to start out but will be a playmaker when he puts it all together. Unfortunately for us, the injury discount is fading, and the MB hype train is revving up. I’ve seen him going as high as 4 now in a couple mocks.
“BE CURIOUS, NOT JUDGMENTAL…”
Posts: 582
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Joined: Feb 2022
(06-06-2026, 01:35 PM)OBX Maverick Wrote: MB is legit. He’s got all the tools. He’ll be a little inconsistent to start out but will be a playmaker when he puts it all together. Unfortunately for us, the injury discount is fading, and the MB hype train is revving up. I’ve seen him going as high as 4 now in a couple mocks.
I don’t see him breaking into the top-4, but wouldn’t shock me if he’s pick 5. It’s going to be interesting to see Masai’s draft day strategy in probably the most consequential draft in franchise history.
Posts: 6,973
Threads: 9
Likes Received: 1,476 in 1,076 posts
Likes Given: 1,633
Likes Received: 1,476 in 1,076 posts
Likes Given: 1,633
Joined: Oct 2019
Michigan big men Yaxel Lendeborg and Morez Johnson Jr. are among the prospects who have had individual pre-draft workouts with the Thunder, according to Justin Martinez of The Oklahoman
Posts: 582
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Joined: Feb 2022
(06-07-2026, 11:48 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Michigan big men Yaxel Lendeborg and Morez Johnson Jr. are among the prospects who have had individual pre-draft workouts with the Thunder, according to Justin Martinez of The Oklahoman
Gonna have to pick one of them at 12, both aren’t making it to 17
Posts: 6,003
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Joined: Dec 2020
(06-07-2026, 11:48 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Michigan big men Yaxel Lendeborg and Morez Johnson Jr. are among the prospects who have had individual pre-draft workouts with the Thunder, according to Justin Martinez of The Oklahoman
Either makes more sense than Mara for them.
Posts: 11,472
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Joined: Oct 2020
I would love to see Dallas move up from 30, but even if they did that pick should not be position focused. Just find the player you think will end up being the best. If they take a point at 9, and one of the secondary point falls and you really like one, than I have no problem making that pick.
Posts: 20,054
Threads: 69
Likes Received: 12,798 in 6,571 posts
Likes Given: 13,572
Likes Received: 12,798 in 6,571 posts
Likes Given: 13,572
Joined: Aug 2020
(06-07-2026, 02:46 PM)Chicagojk Wrote: I would love to see Dallas move up from 30, but even if they did that pick should not be position focused. Just find the player you think will end up being the best. If they take a point at 9, and one of the secondary point falls and you really like one, than I have no problem making that pick.
I'd be ok with them drafting 3 point guards and getting another in free agency, tbh. It's the most important position, by far, and nothing matters if you don't have one, so...you know, whatever it takes to ensure they find the right one to develop next to Flagg.
Posts: 6,003
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Likes Received: 5,543 in 2,836 posts
Likes Given: 3,713
Joined: Dec 2020
06-07-2026, 03:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-07-2026, 03:32 PM by mvossman.)
(06-07-2026, 02:51 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I'd be ok with them drafting 3 point guards and getting another in free agency, tbh. It's the most important position, by far, and nothing matters if you don't have one, so...you know, whatever it takes to ensure they find the right one to develop next to Flagg.
I'm curious how broad your definition of point guard is. Would you consider Shai, Jrue, Murray, Curry and James point guards?
Posts: 582
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Likes Received: 336 in 211 posts
Likes Given: 33
Joined: Feb 2022
(06-07-2026, 02:51 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I'd be ok with them drafting 3 point guards and getting another in free agency, tbh. It's the most important position, by far, and nothing matters if you don't have one, so...you know, whatever it takes to ensure they find the right one to develop next to Flagg.
Is this assuming Kyrie gets moved?
Posts: 11,472
Threads: 21
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Likes Received: 6,555 in 3,734 posts
Likes Given: 418
Joined: Oct 2020
(06-07-2026, 03:05 PM)mvossman Wrote: I'm curious how broad your definition of point guard is. Would you consider Shai, Jrue, Murray, Curry and James point guards?
It is tough to define a vision as we don't even have a head coach. We also don't really know Masai and Schmitz vision as they rebuild this team. We have some history with Masai but his vision could be different with already having a top building block on the roster.
I think there is a good chance sooner or later that Flagg is going to have the ball more than anyone else. I personally would like to get away from the pure point guard types. I think/hope the vision is having 3 or 4 guys who can all create when they have the ball. There is a room for a true point guard like Nembhard, but I wouldn't prioritize that position if he wasn't the best player. This is coming from a guy who always liked the pure point guard types the most. The league has gotten away from these type of players as must haves.
|