Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.67 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Trade & FA 2025-26: Free Agency Starts 5pm CST/6pm EST
So Windhorst is reporting that AD may be traded for expiring deals only. The Mavs may not have a choice if such a trade is possible. The payroll is just too high considering the team’s current prospects. That will close the books on the trade as Luka for Max, a first in the fairly distant future, and salary savings. Basically, Luka is going to be a salary dump. Nice work Mavs.
Like Reply
(4 hours ago)Chicagojk Wrote: If true, this means financial isn't the main driver to get rid of AD right now.  So unless Mavs feel like AD body is done or if he has no motivation to be a good player, I think the answer is you keep him unless you get a good offer.  With his injury, I just don't see  good offer coming.   

Sure, you are rolling the dice again.   Next year if he has 3 months of healthy, good play teams will talk themselves into him again.   Hey, yes he has a lot of injuries but man those Maverick injuries are fake and he is still a top 25 player....etc.   

That would be my plan....sure I could be going down a dangerous path but I just don't want to dump him for cap relief if my owner is not pressuring me to cut salary.

I don't think it is true, honestly. It could be, but I think this is more of a "you all think we're desperate and that we're about to give AD away, but we're fine with keeping him" meant to (hopefully) nudge towards an offer they can swallow. In reality, I think they probably are a little desperate, and they might actually be about to give him away. We'll see. 

I don't even know what I'm hoping for, at this point.
[-] The following 2 users Like KillerLeft's post:
  • BigDirk41, RoyTarpleysGhost
Like Reply
(3 hours ago)KillerLeft Wrote: I don't think it is true, honestly. It could be, but I think this is more of a "you all think we're desperate and that we're about to give AD away, but we're fine with keeping him." In reality, I think they probably are a little desperate, and they might actually be about to give him away. We'll see. 

I don't even know what I'm hoping for, at this point.

If they can somehow manage a first in any given draft that would be a huge win, but I doubt it.
Like Reply
If there is a way to get the CLE 1st from ATL by plugging in Gafford or Marshall into an AD trade that would be the way to go.

We REALLY need to start building towards the Flagg era. Replacing Kyrie will be hard enough without tradeable picks or cap room.

Outside of the AD stuff trading Marshall would be priority nr 1 for me. He is only under contract for 1.5 seasons. Gotta sell high for once, get a shot at another long term rotation guy and nail that pick.

I would not mind trading Gafford but he would be an important safety net here next season given Lively‘s health troubles. OTOH I do see the point in moving him now given that he doesnt appear to be a great fit anymore.
[-] The following 1 user Likes JamesConway912's post:
  • KillerLeft
Like Reply
(3 hours ago)JamesConway912 Wrote: If there is a way to get the CLE 1st from ATL by plugging in Gafford or Marshall into an AD trade that would be the way to go.

We REALLY need to start building towards the Flagg era. Replacing Kyrie will be hard enough without tradeable picks or cap room.

Outside of the SD stuff trading Marshall would be priority nr 1 for me. He is only under contract for 1.5 seasons. Gotta sell high for once, get a shot at another long term rotation guy and nail that pick.

I would not mind trading Gafford but he would be an important safety net here next season given Lively‘s health troubles. OTOH I do see the point in moving him now given that he doesnt appear to be a great fit anymore.

Pretty much right there with all of this.

Only, I keep seeing people mention the need to keep Gafford because of AD possibly being traded and Lively being hurt. I get it from a "number of quality centers" standpoint, but to be honest I think this point guard-less season has proven that Gafford currently doesn't fit here very well at all, regardless of who's available to play or not. I might be wrong about this, but to my thinking there's kind of no point in keeping Gafford around without a plan to use him offensively, and what we've seen them do to work him in this season has not been working. He's not old, exactly, but he's not young, either, and the Mavs are currently wasting one of his last prime seasons asking him to be a complete fish out of water. I'd be very tempted to sell high on him, too, regardless of what happens with AD. Just my personal take on it. I think it's the best thing for him, even.
[-] The following 1 user Likes KillerLeft's post:
  • mvossman
Like Reply
(3 hours ago)Smitty Wrote: ESPN talked to multiple teams, and there is still a belief that Davis, even with the injury, could be moved before the Feb. 5 trade deadline. Similar to the Brandon Ingram trade to the Toronto Raptors last February, teams are using the window leading up to the deadline to build out their roster for the next season. We saw this approach again when the Washington Wizards acquired Trae Young from the Atlanta Hawks last week.

Davis is under contract for two more seasons, including a player option for 2027-28. Starting Aug. 6, he can sign up to a four-year, $275 million extension.

If no deal develops, Dallas could hold on to Davis and revisit trade talks in the offseason. With Davis under contract, Dallas is projected to be over the second apron next year. After the 2026 draft, the Mavericks don't control their own first-round pick until 2031. -- Bobby Marks

Here is the 13 minute clip of Bobby Marks talking to DLLS Mavs podcast

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lvPZeExco4
Like Reply
(3 hours ago)ThisIStheYear Wrote: So Windhorst is reporting that AD may be traded for expiring deals only. The Mavs may not have a choice if such a trade is possible. The payroll is just too high considering the team’s current prospects.  That will close the books on the trade as Luka for Max, a first in the fairly distant future, and salary savings.  Basically, Luka is going to be a salary dump. Nice work Mavs.

They have no choice only if they want a redux of the KP trade.
Like Reply
(3 hours ago)ThisIStheYear Wrote: So Windhorst is reporting that AD may be traded for expiring deals only. The Mavs may not have a choice if such a trade is possible. The payroll is just too high considering the team’s current prospects.  That will close the books on the trade as Luka for Max, a first in the fairly distant future, and salary savings.  Basically, Luka is going to be a salary dump. Nice work Mavs.

I don't think its a no choice situation.  They have plenty of options to shed cap.  Gafford, Klay and Naji could all be traded for expiring (and potentially assets).  I do think it will be a fail if this organization doesn't clear some cap at the TDL.  It will put too much pressure on the offseason otherwise.
[-] The following 1 user Likes mvossman's post:
  • BigDirk41
Like Reply
Dallas wants expiring, picks and young talent. Plain and simple. It’s amazing that people on here can’t comprehend the truth that this is what they want and what they eventually will get.

There is very VERY little logic or objectivity on this board. Just a lot of nervous nannies.
Like Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: cow, 23 Guest(s)