Posts: 4,704
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 4,272 in 2,187 posts
Likes Given: 2,947
Likes Received: 4,272 in 2,187 posts
Likes Given: 2,947
Joined: Dec 2020
(07-17-2024, 11:54 AM)HoosierDaddyKid Wrote: Good point. But I don't think there is anything the PA can do about it. They may not like it, but they can't dictate to a player how to work his contract.
They do in baseball. That is obviously a more powerful union, but they put a lot of pressure on players not to take pay cuts. Of course teams are not nearly as constrained so its a different environment, but it can happen.
Posts: 169
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 194 in 87 posts
Likes Given: 677
Likes Received: 194 in 87 posts
Likes Given: 677
Joined: Dec 2020
(07-17-2024, 01:16 PM)mvossman Wrote: They do in baseball. That is obviously a more powerful union, but they put a lot of pressure on players not to take pay cuts. Of course teams are not nearly as constrained so its a different environment, but it can happen.
I don't really follow baseball - do they have a set percentage of revenue that has to paid to the players? Because that's the central point F Gump is making. The new rules mean the particular distribution has changed somewhat, but the players collectively (which is the whole point of the Players association) are getting the exact same amount of money they would have gotten before the new rules went into place.