Posts: 1,277
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 370 in 277 posts
Likes Given: 1,178
Likes Received: 370 in 277 posts
Likes Given: 1,178
Joined: Feb 2025
I can't believe the Mavs are so good after have gifted a generation talent for nothing 18 months ago.
I can't believe the Lakers are not so good after they received a generation talent for nothing 18 months ago.
It's a miracle... Or Karma like i said the day after that trade.
Posts: 477
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 316 in 174 posts
Likes Given: 127
Likes Received: 316 in 174 posts
Likes Given: 127
Joined: Dec 2019
(2 hours ago)FireNicoHarrison Wrote: I can't believe the Mavs are so good after have gifted a generation talent for nothing 18 months ago.
I can't believe the Lakers are not so good after they received a generation talent for nothing 18 months ago.
It's a miracle... Or Karma like i said the day after that trade.
Just shows how quickly things can change in NBA. It’s why I find all this discussion of “timelines” so silly.
Posts: 4,260
Threads: 46
Likes Received: 4,478 in 2,112 posts
Likes Given: 4,255
Likes Received: 4,478 in 2,112 posts
Likes Given: 4,255
Joined: Oct 2019
(2 hours ago)mvossman Wrote: I'm not saying its impossible for this team to be contending during Flagg first contract. I'm simply saying I don't think the FO should be operating under the mindset that it is their best window to compete.
Again, it depends on one's definition of contending. Yours is clearly different than DallasMaverick.
We agree that I don't think they should be trading 3 first round picks right now for someone like Giannis, Kawhi, etc.
Year 4 Flagg? Still on a rookie deal. I might think differently. We get a front row seat to his growth and development.
Posts: 21,012
Threads: 70
Likes Received: 13,786 in 7,091 posts
Likes Given: 14,416
Likes Received: 13,786 in 7,091 posts
Likes Given: 14,416
Joined: Aug 2020
(1 hour ago)Smitty Wrote: Year 4 Flagg? Still on a rookie deal. I might think differently. We get a front row seat to his growth and development.
When you put it like that, I totally agree. If all goes well, that's about when I'd expect the team to have reason to think aggressively.
Posts: 6,395
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 5,932 in 3,030 posts
Likes Given: 3,947
Likes Received: 5,932 in 3,030 posts
Likes Given: 3,947
Joined: Dec 2020
(1 hour ago)Smitty Wrote: Again, it depends on one's definition of contending. Yours is clearly different than DallasMaverick.
We agree that I don't think they should be trading 3 first round picks right now for someone like Giannis, Kawhi, etc.
Year 4 Flagg? Still on a rookie deal. I might think differently. We get a front row seat to his growth and development.
Obviously there will be different conversations in two years depending on where this team is at. But if you really think your best window is within the next three years, that will affect your decisions now. It sounds like you don't want to operate under that mindset right now so we are basically saying the same thing. We can talk about what makes sense for the team in two years in two years.