Thank You...

[fifteenth]

I see, so the other what seems like almost half of the population should trust this because judges said so?  

1) You do understand that public trials of evidence have long been understood as essential for the vetting of facts and truthfulness right? 

2) You do understand that evidence can take considerable time (and money) to properly examine in real trials right? 

3) Just to consider the problem with the position you just stated. Imagine that millions of dollars and hours are spent gathering evidence for something like detailed forensic audits of machines that were used.   

Are you saying that a judge in a court can simply look that evidence over and tell millions of people that its not 'justifiable' evidence? 

Just to be clear, I haven't taken any position on the politics of the matter or taken any side.  That's something that might be discussed back in the days where the 1st amendment was enforced.  I'm simply addressing the original point of how what seems like 1/2 the population could be deceived evidently by one man.

Judges make mistakes. I don't believe, in this instance, that dozens of judges made the same mistake. You can read what the judges said and wrote. In several instances the judges spoke of the scarcity of evidence brought,  not as you say, the abundance of evidence. Many layers were rebuked by judges for wasting the court's time with a lack of evidence. 

I don't understand your first amendment comment. 

And regarding half the country being deceived: it's saddening and frightening. But I think they've been primed to be deceived by Trump because Trump has been telling them they can't trust our institutions for years, Republicans have been sowing seeds of that mistrust for decades in exchange for votes, and the right (voters) hates the left so much that they'll believe almost anything right leaning websites tell them (see QAnon)