04-17-2023, 04:32 PM
There was discussion in one of the threads regarding Turner and whether the league would have approved a trade following his renegotiation. Strictly speaking the way he was extended would have allowed him to be traded w/o waiting the usual six months for an extend and trade.
Bobby Marks is reporting the loophole is closed in the new CBA and cases like Turner's will require a six month wait.
[/url]
Bobby Marks
@BobbyMarks42
This trade loophole is now closed in the new CBA.
Any player that renegotiates and extends his contract cannot be traded for 6 months.
Turner technically could have been because the extension in year 1 did not exceed 105%.
Quote Tweet
@BobbyMarks42
·
Jan 28
Here is a breakdown of the Myles Turner renegotiation.
Because this was a renegotiation, Indiana was allowed to decrease the salary in the first year of the extension to 40%.
Turner is still eligible to be traded by 2/9.
[url=https://mobile.twitter.com/BobbyMarks42/status/1619459327546523648/photo/1]
Bobby Marks is reporting the loophole is closed in the new CBA and cases like Turner's will require a six month wait.
[/url]
Bobby Marks
@BobbyMarks42
This trade loophole is now closed in the new CBA.
Any player that renegotiates and extends his contract cannot be traded for 6 months.
Turner technically could have been because the extension in year 1 did not exceed 105%.
Quote Tweet
@BobbyMarks42
·
Jan 28
Here is a breakdown of the Myles Turner renegotiation.
Because this was a renegotiation, Indiana was allowed to decrease the salary in the first year of the extension to 40%.
Turner is still eligible to be traded by 2/9.
[url=https://mobile.twitter.com/BobbyMarks42/status/1619459327546523648/photo/1]