Mavs 107, Kings 121

[omahen]

To me, it's not that simple of an evaluation.  What is more important to me is the quality of the shots the different players are getting.  A lot of Luka's shots are 10 on a scale of 10 in difficulty.

Define quality of shots. Player A is shooting 35 % on his (what you say are difficult) shots and player B is shooting same percentage on his, let's say wide open, shots. What criteria makes shot of player A a shot of lesser quality? 

ILLUSTRATE A POINT, not put up a comprehensive detailed 5 hour documentary on each second of the game

It took me some time to get through all the insults you use, but let me try for the last time. The problem I have with your argument is exactly what is written in your quote above. You take a couple of pictures which should be a proof that Luka is a problem of this team. Your claim to which I responded. First by trying to paint the whole picture and then to provide the analysis of whole situations in that specific plays, clearly pointing that Luka made a correct basketball decision in most of that specific cases. The most obvious one was the photo from Memphis game. Every time I added more context to a specific photo you claimed you don't have time to analyze everything. It is not my problem you rather take a photo out of context than watch the whole situation

More important is the bigger picture. It is clear that Luka is a positive for the team, that he is an efficient scorer and that KP is getting a lot of shots. Second most on the team, top 50 in NBA. These are all facts that directly contradict the point you are trying to prove. This is the real whole picture of Mavs situation. This doesn't mean Luka is only making correct decisions. Of course not, no one is claiming that. It also doesn't mean Luka always passes to open teammate. But it also surely doesn't mean that KP is CONSTANTLY neglected while Luka is playing hero ball and passing to other teammates, like you are trying to claim by posting a couple of pictures.