11-04-2020, 02:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-04-2020, 02:59 PM by KillerLeft.)
I don’t disagree, @"Kammrath". I think they’ve erred on the vet side of that equation a few times in the past, and it has caused problems for the team.
I’ll agree with your wish, but I’ll stop short of using the word “always” and say that I feel it should be evaluated on a case by case basis. But, yeah, they’ve made the choice to punt far too often.
THIS YEAR, I think that unless 18 can bring a difference maker as part of a trade package I’d prefer them to draft at least one rookie. I don’t think they’re as close to contention as some do, so I’d still be squarely in develop talent mode, especially over spending assets on role players.
I’ll agree with your wish, but I’ll stop short of using the word “always” and say that I feel it should be evaluated on a case by case basis. But, yeah, they’ve made the choice to punt far too often.
THIS YEAR, I think that unless 18 can bring a difference maker as part of a trade package I’d prefer them to draft at least one rookie. I don’t think they’re as close to contention as some do, so I’d still be squarely in develop talent mode, especially over spending assets on role players.