10-06-2020, 09:52 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-06-2020, 10:03 PM by Scott41theMavs.)
(10-06-2020, 08:56 PM)fifteenth Wrote:(10-06-2020, 05:47 PM)ThunderMav Wrote: Too late the damage is done:
https://twitter.com/ClayTravis/status/13...3017395200
I checked real news sites and couldn't find anything like this. What did Silver actually say?
(10-06-2020, 05:05 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote:(10-06-2020, 04:51 PM)Kammrath Wrote: https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/...-movement/
I read it, and can only shake my head at your posting it. Carry on!
What did you not like about the article, Scott? Just curious.
They act like the movement should not be judged by its leadership, but then conflate the popular sense of Black Lives Matter with the official movement. In other words, popular participation in efforts toward police reform and the elimination of racism absolves the leadership and the official movement as a whole. Ah, nope. I respect the desire of individuals for a less racist world. I disagree wholeheartedly with the stated goals of the leaders and the official movement. And I take it back after reading the peace - they're right; they aren't classical Marxists, but they promote anarchy, which promotes many times more chaos and violence in the very neighborhoods the movement would seemingly want to promote and protect, and denigrate the right and value of private property, which is one of the cornerstones of respect for one's fellow humanity and individual freedom and prosperity. And I don't say that as some fan of neoliberalism. Moreover, I'm a dinosauric lover of the nuclear family and heteronormism, so I'm going to see their goals in those areas as pretty toxic.