07-02-2026, 01:33 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-02-2026, 01:33 PM by RoyTarpleysGhost.)
(07-02-2026, 01:21 PM)mvossman Wrote: I meant at the 5 and 4. That grouping would be fine, but I would have rather spent assets to find a small forward that could provide Aldama level shooting and better perimeter defense.
Yep. I just see too many guys whose best position is the 4. That’s the big problem for me. You already had too many guys whose best position is the 4. Now you’ve added more.
You can write down 1-2 of them as a center and 1-2 as a small forward on paper and go “see they all fit.” I don’t know. It’s tough. One might call these players versatile. I say penciling them in out of position isn’t versatility.
For me, PJ would have to be moved for a solid return for any of this to make sense.