06-28-2026, 10:24 PM
To me, Burries would have helped in creation, ball handling and most of all that is lacking in the backcourt.
But he would have been a ball-handling SG who can do spot minutes at PG.
Mavs would still be shopping for a PG.
Morez's pick is justifiable not just of his play, but also how the lineup can turn out. As Burries can do spot-minutes at PG, Morez would most likely have a role more than just someone who can do small ball 5 in spurts specially if it turns out that DLive may not be the long term C for the Mavs.
IMHO, both Burries and Morez have limited ceilings, and the Mavs just went after the safer floor.
If this would have been Morez vs. Flemmings -- I would have flamed the Mavs for not taking a PG who most likely would have been decent-to-good in year 1.
But he would have been a ball-handling SG who can do spot minutes at PG.
Mavs would still be shopping for a PG.
Morez's pick is justifiable not just of his play, but also how the lineup can turn out. As Burries can do spot-minutes at PG, Morez would most likely have a role more than just someone who can do small ball 5 in spurts specially if it turns out that DLive may not be the long term C for the Mavs.
IMHO, both Burries and Morez have limited ceilings, and the Mavs just went after the safer floor.
If this would have been Morez vs. Flemmings -- I would have flamed the Mavs for not taking a PG who most likely would have been decent-to-good in year 1.