03-27-2026, 10:07 PM
I think there is very little argument to be made that Burries and Philon aren´t better than Flemings and Wagler right now. Question is how much Flemings/Wagler will improve until the age of Burries/Philon in 1-2 years.
I already made the argument that the Mavs are not very good at developing players. I´d argue they have one of the best success rates in the draft when taking proven, but are absolutely abysmal, when taking projects.
I somewhat doubt that Burries is 6´4, but he looks more athletic than Flemings to me, who everybody gushes about as the next Rose/Morant.
I already made the argument that the Mavs are not very good at developing players. I´d argue they have one of the best success rates in the draft when taking proven, but are absolutely abysmal, when taking projects.
I somewhat doubt that Burries is 6´4, but he looks more athletic than Flemings to me, who everybody gushes about as the next Rose/Morant.