12-21-2025, 03:41 PM
(12-20-2025, 07:32 PM)F Gump Wrote: Flagg is capable of being the #1 player. But his game and growth has been even better when he is able to be the #2 (with AD) and I wonder if he takes yet another leap in growth if Kyrie returns and he's able to be #3.My desire to trade AD was due to his wanting to play the 4. AD at the 4 with everyone healthy never made sense. Now that he’s playing center I’m perfectly ok keeping AD unless a trade offer just blows me away. AD/Lively is a great center rotation assuming both are healthy which I know is a big assumption. Lively is still young enough and his value and contract low enough that I take a chance that he can back up AD at the 5 and eventually replace AD when he ages out. Flagg in your 4 period. Maybe eventually a 3 but I much prefer him at the 4. I definitely want to see Flagg-AD-Kyrie. For me Gafford is now the odd man out. His style of play simply no longer fits in a non-Luka world. I like PJ and at times his fit with Flagg seems great and other times poor. I simply can’t make up my mind. But the idea of a front line of AD-PJ-Flagg is appealing. For me with Kyrie back the hole is a 2 guard who is big-can play the point if needed-shoots the 3 well and can “get his” when needed. He needs to be a consistent 18-20 ppg scorer. I don’t know if that player is available or even exists. But if he does any combination of Gafford-Martin-Klay-Hardy that gets us that type of player on Flagg’s timeline is the goal.
To me, those aspects make me cautious with the value of a trade. It makes me solidly entrenched in the idea that any trade of AD outgoing has to give the Mavs a player who is either a star now, or who has the capacity to become one. Otherwise, I want to see them keep AD and Kyrie TO ACCELERATE THE GROWTH OF FLAGG.


![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)