MV, words have meaning beyond the exact literal words on the page. That's how language works. I may have used words in responding that were not your exact words, but they were still definitely your ideas.
In your latest, you complain when I don't address some of your words, and then object when I do address others (which you call parsing them). You can't have it both ways. I'll just have to do the best I can with my responses, and you do you, and I'll do me.
In this post, at first I did go in and address some of the specifics in your most recent post, which also addressed earlier ones too, but on further thought, I'm just deleting all of that and bailing on the details entirely. It was just pointing out the same contradictions in what YOU keep saying, and pointing out how what I was saying addressed your very ideas. But in this back-and-forth I have already addressed your ideas (which yes, my words were indeed speaking to exactly what you said, even if I didn't use the very same words that you did), and obviously you are clearly assuming a whole set of extremely negative outcomes which I see as too assumptive, so I will leave it at that.
BOTTOM LINE. I've tried to respond to what YOU apparently wanted to assert, and I spoke to YOUR words from the get-go, but your response that I am making things up (never did) has made no sense and is wrong. Everything I gave in response has been true to what you wrote AND keep writing, even if they weren't your exact words. Overall, your ideas were written as a declaration of how bad things will be, so if they aren't intended to be negative after all, and highly so, I'm not sure what your opinion really is intended to be. I'll leave it at that.
In your latest, you complain when I don't address some of your words, and then object when I do address others (which you call parsing them). You can't have it both ways. I'll just have to do the best I can with my responses, and you do you, and I'll do me.
In this post, at first I did go in and address some of the specifics in your most recent post, which also addressed earlier ones too, but on further thought, I'm just deleting all of that and bailing on the details entirely. It was just pointing out the same contradictions in what YOU keep saying, and pointing out how what I was saying addressed your very ideas. But in this back-and-forth I have already addressed your ideas (which yes, my words were indeed speaking to exactly what you said, even if I didn't use the very same words that you did), and obviously you are clearly assuming a whole set of extremely negative outcomes which I see as too assumptive, so I will leave it at that.
BOTTOM LINE. I've tried to respond to what YOU apparently wanted to assert, and I spoke to YOUR words from the get-go, but your response that I am making things up (never did) has made no sense and is wrong. Everything I gave in response has been true to what you wrote AND keep writing, even if they weren't your exact words. Overall, your ideas were written as a declaration of how bad things will be, so if they aren't intended to be negative after all, and highly so, I'm not sure what your opinion really is intended to be. I'll leave it at that.