06-17-2025, 03:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-17-2025, 03:31 PM by HoosierDaddyKid.)
(06-17-2025, 12:25 PM)DallasMaverick Wrote: For what?
Another bad, underperforming contract? Or maybe try to attach something of value, in order to get back a somewhat less bad contract?
If they could just tear up his contract and release him today, I think they’d be overjoyed.
It just sucks to overpay a “star” player. Totally ties your hands.
I think they hold onto him until the contract is over, and try to get some usable play out of him in the meantime. Similar to Deandre Ayton.
By my estimation, Beal was never a star. He just got paid like one. He didn't even warrant having a no-trade clause in his contract. His agent should be in the Hall of Fame.