06-04-2025, 09:22 PM
(06-04-2025, 05:53 PM)Ghost of Podkolzin Wrote: I keep going back to Dyson Daniels; I'd take him over Herbert Jones. Younger, plays better D, and is precisely what we need in a PG.
IMO, we overvalue DLive and undervalue AD. This works, and I think gives us a chip.
DLive/OMax for Daniels works
Daniels, Exum
Kyrie, Klay, Christie
Flagg, Matin
PJ, Naji
AD, Gafford
I have questions and tweaks to the idea, but if Lively is outgoing, Daniels is way more the type of return I would have to see. Thank you.
Wondering ...
1 Is Daniels really a PG who can run an offense and get the ball up the floor? If so, I'm very interested. If not, not so much.
2 Would ATL be open to trading him, and do they really need a C more than they need Daniels? If so, I'm very interested. If not, this won't get off the ground.
But I'm still quite hesitant. IMO Lively's ceiling is really high. (That's tempered a bit for me because of his tendency to get hurt easily and often.)
Tweak issues ...
DLive/OMax doesn't quite get there for me, because it will ADD to Mavs payroll due to the 2-for-1, when the Mavs need to be going the other way capwise. The cap issue has to be addressed. And including OMax, his outgoing salary doesn't really help enough to matter (his salary is barely more than the minimum salary you will use to refill his roster spot).
However, if you increase the salary outgoing alongside Lively, then it makes way more sense and becomes much more enticing to me. What would I want to see? I probably couldn't say no to Lively/Martin/Hardy/Powell for Daniels/13/22. (And if they would only offer 0 or 1 of the picks, or preferably a future 1st rather than a current one, I might still pull the trigger.)