05-24-2025, 04:04 AM
(05-23-2025, 11:22 AM)F Gump Wrote: Actually no... instead the net result is a payroll GAIN of about 6M more over A2. Because it's a 4-for-1, there's also the cost of refilling 3 empty roster slots.
Yeah that's true.
Although, 4 for 1 is actually the reason I like this trade, because as much as I like Gafford, the rest are players I actually want to get rid of.
Holiday is also a serviceable and popular NBA player, that we might be able to get rid of for expiring if it isn't working out. Although that might be just theoretical.