Trade & FA 2024-25:

[KillerLeft]

First off, Lively >> Gafford.

But injuries and a lack of an offensive game besides lobs is limiting.  He's only played in half of the games in his career.

But Gafford is MORE limited and older. I'm not understanding the motivation for selling Lively at this point, at least relative to Gafford. Maybe I'm missing part of your point. 

Are you suggesting this because you think you can get MORE now for Lively than Gafford, and that this is potentially the high water mark for Lively's value? If so, I understand the logic but disagree. I think Lively has a ton of growth ahead of him and selling him now would be a huge mistake.