Trade & FA 2024-25:

[Knutsen]

Ehhh....this is not made up, I just entered that prompt, and this was the answer from version 4 (current) of ChatGPT

ChatGPT 4



You said:

did nico Harrison make the right decision trading luka doncic?

ChatGPT said:

Nico Harrison hasn't traded Luka Doncic. Luka is still with the Dallas Mavericks and continues to be a pivotal player for the team. There might be some rumors or hypothetical discussions out there, but as of now, Luka remains a Maverick.

Thanks for the inspiration! I just asked ChatGPT the following question, since you had proven that it doesn’t know yet that the trade went down:

———————-
Would a trade of Luka Doncic to the Los Angeles Lakers for Anthony Davis, Max Christie and a 2029 first round pick be a good or a bad trade for the Dallas Mavericks? 
———————-

Here is the reply I got:

———————-
This trade would be a bad trade for the Dallas Mavericks. Here’s why:

Why It’s Bad for Dallas

1. Luka is a generational talent – He is a 25-year-old superstar who can single-handedly carry an offense. Trading him for an older star (Davis), a role player (Christie), and a distant pick is not a good return.
2. Anthony Davis’s durability concerns – While Davis is an elite two-way player, he has an extensive injury history. He is also older (31 by next season) and may not be able to lead a franchise long-term.
3. Lack of future assets – A 2029 first-round pick is too far out to have immediate value, and Christie is an unproven role player. Dallas would be giving up a top-5 player without securing young talent or multiple high picks in return.
4. Lack of a playmaker – Davis is not a playmaker like Luka. Losing Doncic would leave Dallas without a true offensive engine unless they find a replacement elsewhere.

Why the Lakers Would Love This Trade

• They get Luka, one of the best offensive players in the NBA, to pair with LeBron (if he stays) or build around for the next decade.
• Even without Davis, they could add depth through other moves and still compete at a high level

Better Trade Options for Dallas

If the Mavs ever traded Luka, they should demand a massive haul, similar to what Brooklyn got for Kevin Durant—multiple young players and multiple first-round picks. This package from the Lakers simply isn’t enough.

Final verdict: Dallas should reject this trade.
———————-

I continued asking:

———————-
If trade went down as described, what would happen? 
———————-

With the following reply: 

———————-
If the trade happened as described—Luka Dončić to the Lakers for Anthony Davis, Max Christie, and a 2029 first-round pick—here’s how it would likely play out for both teams:

For the Dallas Mavericks

1. Immediate Playoff Outlook (2024-25 Season)
• The Mavericks would still be competitive with Kyrie Irving and Anthony Davis, but they would lack an elite playmaker.
• Davis and Irving would be a talented duo, but injuries could derail their success. Irving has had availability concerns as well.
• They might finish as a lower-seed playoff team (5th-8th in the West) rather than a contender.
2. Long-Term Impact
• Losing Luka removes their franchise cornerstone, and AD is not a long-term solution (turning 32 in 2025).
• Max Christie is a decent young piece but isn’t a future star.
• The 2029 first-round pick is too far out to help anytime soon.
3. Potential Next Moves
• If things go south, the Mavs might be forced into a full rebuild, eventually trading AD and Kyrie.
• They could struggle to attract another superstar without Luka.

For the Los Angeles Lakers

1. Immediate Playoff Outlook
• Luka and LeBron James together would make the Lakers instant contenders. Luka is the perfect player to take over the offense while LeBron transitions into a secondary role.
• Even without AD, they could sign or trade for a defensive big man to balance the roster.
• The Lakers could challenge for a top-3 seed in the West and a deep playoff run.
2. Long-Term Impact
• The Lakers secure a franchise player for the next decade. Even if LeBron retires in the next year or two, Luka can carry the team.
• They give up minimal assets—only one pick and a role player—so they could still make further moves.
• Free agents would likely want to join a Luka-led Lakers team, making roster-building easier.

Overall Consequences

• The Lakers would win this trade easily, getting a generational superstar for an aging and injury-prone AD.
• The Mavericks would likely regret the trade within a year or two, realizing they gave up a long-term MVP candidate without getting enough in return.
• It could lead to Dallas eventually rebuilding, while the Lakers would be set for the future.

Final Take: This trade would shift the power balance in the NBA significantly—favoring the Lakers and hurting the Mavericks in both the short and long term.
———————-

And finally, to put things into perspective:

———————-
Would it be considered one of the worst trades of all time or just as a bad trade for the Mavs?
———————-
It would likely be remembered as a bad trade for the Mavericks, but not necessarily one of the worst trades in NBA history. Here’s why:

Why it’s a Bad Trade for Dallas

• Giving up a generational superstar – Luka Dončić is only 25 and already an MVP-level player. Trading him without getting a comparable young star or multiple assets is a massive loss.
• AD’s injury concerns – Anthony Davis is a great player but has an extensive injury history and is much older (turning 32 in 2025). His value is significantly lower than Luka’s.
• Lack of future assets – The Mavs only get one far-out first-round pick (2029) and a role player (Max Christie), which is nowhere near enough value.

Why It’s Not Among the Worst Trades Ever

While it’s a terrible deal for Dallas, it doesn’t quite reach the level of historically awful trades, such as:
• Nets trading for aging Paul Pierce & Kevin Garnett (2013) – Brooklyn gave up multiple first-round picks, which became Jayson Tatum and Jaylen Brown, setting the franchise back for years.
• Hornets trading Kobe Bryant for Vlade Divac (1996) – Charlotte traded a teenage Kobe for a solid but unspectacular center, missing out on a future legend.
• Thunder trading James Harden for role players (2012) – OKC gave up an MVP-caliber player for a weak return, breaking up a potential dynasty.

Final Verdict

This trade would be a horrible move for Dallas, but it wouldn’t be as franchise-crippling as some of the worst trades in NBA history. However, if Luka went on to win multiple championships in LA while Dallas never recovered, it could be retroactively viewed as an all-time blunder.
———————-

So one thing‘s for sure: AI is way more capable than Nico!