02-22-2025, 10:21 AM
(02-22-2025, 10:08 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: I'm in the Anti-Durant trade camp. I look at Christie as the de facto starter at SG (He closes and gets more minutes than Thompson). So, with a lineup of Irving, Christie, PJ, AD and Lively all healthy, what do you really need (besides health)? Who is your weak link that demands to be replaced? Sorry, I don't see gutting the depth for the spread between KD and PJ (for instance). I'm GREAT with Christie and PJ as my 4th/5th starters.
We can win games based on our depth. Gafford, Martin, Naji, Thompson (effectively). The age and history of our stars demands good depth IMHO. With AD and PJ having positional optionality, you have plenty up front and tons of wing-defender options (maybe too many). As many many have noted, we could probably use some more creation off the bench. I'd like to keep Exum, but I don't want to be dependent on Exum. I'm fine if we trade Hardy and some wing depth for that creation or if we draft it and let it develop behind Exum. I'm fine going to war the next three years with something like that. If we get there we get there. A championship was never guaranteed whether we did the Christie trade or not
What worries me is the rumors around Nico's attempts to do a KD deal before the deadline and the fact AD gave up $6mm. Did he really do that so we could trade Grimes for Martin? I doubt it and that worries me.
I might be okay in a "sure, whatever" sort of way with a KD trade - as long as Christie, PJ, and Lively aren't included in the deal.