01-30-2020, 05:49 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-30-2020, 05:50 PM by dirkfansince1998.)
(01-30-2020, 05:42 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote:(01-30-2020, 05:37 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: RoCo's an elite defender. If Mavs can get him without giving up DFS that would be ideal. I might give up DFS to get him, not sure if the Mavs will pull the trigger on such a deal tho. Do love me some RoCo.
DFS has strong positive value as a contributor on a very small and locked-in contract. I would rather keep him. If he were part of a RoCo deal, I would not include any other sweeteners (i.e. Wright, Brunson, the GSW 2nd) - just something like Lee, Jackson, and DFS (and perhaps a long-term 2nd) for RoCo.
This. The Mavs need more than one wing sized 3&D player. It shouldn´t be DFS or RoCo. In a pipe dream the Mavs have both. I would rather give up one of the guards (probably Wright...easier to match contracts and I prefer Brunson). No DFS is not as good as RoCo but that doesn´t mean that the Mavs would not have 25 minutes for him after trading for RoCo. More minutes for long and athletic wings won´t lead to worse results.